win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?  (Read 6231 times)

SG17

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« on: November 28, 2015, 06:55:29 PM »
with my sport league about to hit our heavy oil pattern and me needing to replace an old ball (Virtual Gravity) I was wanting to read more on the nirvana.

To my surprise I am not able to find a review on BTM and teammate with a subscription to Bowlers Journal has said they haven't seen one there either.

are those 2 publications no longer reviewing Brunswick equipment?  reviews still in progress?  Did I just miss it?

 

Snakster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2015, 08:05:14 PM »
with my sport league about to hit our heavy oil pattern and me needing to replace an old ball (Virtual Gravity) I was wanting to read more on the nirvana.

To my surprise I am not able to find a review on BTM and teammate with a subscription to Bowlers Journal has said they haven't seen one there either.

are those 2 publications no longer reviewing Brunswick equipment?  reviews still in progress?  Did I just miss it?
I was aware BTM no longer getting balls, surprised to hear BJI didn't get one. No answer as to 'why' has been provided. Just claims the HP balls are still provided. Though lack of reviews of said HP balls suggests otherwise.
Current bag:
DV8 Turmoil 2 Pearl
Radical Squatch hybrid
Motiv Forza GT
Hammer Black Widow Gold
DV8 Vandal
DV8 Creed Rebellion

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2015, 08:54:26 PM »
Have had two drilled. One by a friend local and one shipped out further away. Both agree the ball flat out hooks. Not sure what else to tell you other then plan accordingly.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

mattypizon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2015, 09:23:51 PM »
BJI did in fact review it. Ask your buddy to check the October issue again

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8451
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2015, 09:21:29 AM »
No review of the DV8 Vandal in BTM.  I had considered it before Brunswick, etal decided not to submit mid to lower end balls for reviews.  Big mistake IMO market share loss to companies like Motiv who submit everything.  Being that the majority of bowlers use entry level to mid level balls on THS house leagues.
Scott

Snakster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2015, 10:54:14 AM »
No review of the DV8 Vandal in BTM.  I had considered it before Brunswick, etal decided not to submit mid to lower end balls for reviews.  Big mistake IMO market share loss to companies like Motiv who submit everything.  Being that the majority of bowlers use entry level to mid level balls on THS house leagues.
So I'm not the only one. Hear that Brunswick/DV8/Radical?
Current bag:
DV8 Turmoil 2 Pearl
Radical Squatch hybrid
Motiv Forza GT
Hammer Black Widow Gold
DV8 Vandal
DV8 Creed Rebellion

JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2015, 11:37:42 AM »
No review of the DV8 Vandal in BTM.  I had considered it before Brunswick, etal decided not to submit mid to lower end balls for reviews.  Big mistake IMO market share loss to companies like Motiv who submit everything.  Being that the majority of bowlers use entry level to mid level balls on THS house leagues.
So I'm not the only one. Hear that Brunswick/DV8/Radical?

I'm with Scott and Snakster in that I prefer BTM over BJI and seem to resonate with the findings of BTM much more than BJI.

And another thing that I love about BTM is that all of their reviews are online and can be accessed very easily, compares can be done online to see where they think a certain ball fits in the lineup, etc.  BJI is still in the stone age when it comes to online accessibility. 

Phil/Nick, any response as to why Radical, DV8 and Brunswick are not sending equipment to BTM?

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2015, 09:19:41 PM »
We send high end balls to BTM. The latest batch should be reviewed soon as there was a mixup with the Nirvana. (Thug Life and Guru Supreme coming as well)
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

mattypizon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2015, 09:22:15 PM »
Why are only the high end balls getting reviewed Nick?

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2015, 09:35:26 PM »
It was a business decision based on the decrease of reach when the publication stopped and transitioned into an online-only model. I know it won't be a popular answer as there are still loyal BTM readers, but that was the decision we made. It may change back in the future, nothing is ever set in stone.
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

mattypizon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2015, 09:40:59 PM »
Thanks for the explanation Nick

Snakster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2015, 09:52:31 PM »
It was a business decision based on the decrease of reach when the publication stopped and transitioned into an online-only model. I know it won't be a popular answer as there are still loyal BTM readers, but that was the decision we made. It may change back in the future, nothing is ever set in stone.

Disregard parts of my diatribe in the other thread. Thank you for the reasoning behind the decision. I still think they are throwing the baby out with the bath water.  Admittedly, I do not know what BTM subscriber numbers are.
Current bag:
DV8 Turmoil 2 Pearl
Radical Squatch hybrid
Motiv Forza GT
Hammer Black Widow Gold
DV8 Vandal
DV8 Creed Rebellion

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2015, 10:02:28 PM »
Maybe you can start a topic in Misc seeing who is a paying subscriber to BTM. I would be interested to see how many Ballreviews members pay for the publication.
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2015, 04:53:26 AM »
Maybe you can start a topic in Misc seeing who is a paying subscriber to BTM. I would be interested to see how many Ballreviews members pay for the publication.

I am and I am not happy that the Brunswick family no longer has their balls reviewed by BTM.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Bowlaholic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 711
Re: No review of Nirvana in BTM or Bowlers Journal?
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2015, 06:47:02 AM »
I also subscribe to BTM.  And I rely heavily on their ball evaluations in my purchasing decisions.