Politely... High rev guys and theoretical experts can bypass this one please. I'm interested in practical responses from other low rev players, certainly below 300 and preferably below 250....

I understand the potential of differential, but all too often people talk about theoretical results without looking at the practical impact based on style. For example, last year I mapped out every ball I've used for the last 15 years, and found a consistently favorable result when the differential was above .050, and higher ratings as expected as the potential increased. I use very similar drills, so disregard all the theories of changing differential. From a practical result viewpoint, higher differentials result in a better result for me. For other styles, that is not always the case.

For other low rev players, do you find yourself over a period of time consistently preferring equipment with a higher diff potential? Have you found that balls which others say are great are weak for you and your game?
Thanks in advance

^^this^^

If you believe it, nothing else will convince you otherwise.  You have undrilled numbers. You don't throw undrilled bowling balls.

I think you may be making my point for me, and reading a bit too much into it as well. The simple truth is that additional differential helps a low rev bowler. While it sounds easy to say you do not throw an undrilled bowling ball, that ignores the fact that the use of a high differential layout with a high differential yields more potential for a low rev player.  Again, it kind of cracks me up that everyone thinks I'm trying to change the laws of physics. I'm definitely not. Cover stock has a majority component, but again and respectfully, use of a high differential ball is still statistically significant in a  low revolution players game.

...When it's used in the right environment. Do you even ball down, bruh??

Dude he lives in his world where nothing else matters...he honestly believes this is his private forum and tries to control it and responses
Wonder why no one responds to him seriously
When he was a kid I'm sure he stomped his foot a lot just to get his way

No question that shell has a bigger impact than core on ball reaction.  However, it does seem that in recent years core shell matchup has become more important than either one or the other in a vacuum. 

I use very similar drills, so disregard all the theories of changing differential. From a practical result viewpoint, higher differentials result in a better result for me.

This kind of stood out to me in OP's post.  How can one simply disregard all theory of changing differential?

I was wondering if some of you (rico/ignite/doom) could elaborate on this as it's a little perplexing to me.  Even though the drills would be "similar".......the ending differential would be different based on pre-drilled core shape, no?  Even if the drills would be exactly the same, core shape after drilling would be different even with different .050 differential balls because the core design is different in different lines of balls.

What I'm not understanding is the lack of focus on the differential of the drilled ball.

For other styles, that is not always the case.

Why?

I'm a low rev low speed senior bowler. I Do perfer high differential balls as long as the RG is on the medium to high side. Most senior bowlers suffer from low ball speed so we need length along with enough flare for a strong finish. I currently start with a .058 differential ball with a medium high RG. Actually my favorite bowling balls are no longer available. I'm always scanning eBay for some of the old chestnuts, you never know what you may find.