win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Blue hammer urethane  (Read 10499 times)

xrayjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2682
Blue hammer urethane
« on: September 12, 2015, 02:32:56 AM »
For those who have this ball and/or put time on this ball....

Like or Dislike?

I'm going to give another try with a urethane ball for my second shift league. from my past experiences with other urethanes, I believe the longer pins and/or my low rev rate, made those urethane's undesirable overall.

This urethane - the blue will have a flaring layout at 4" and most likely a cover change. I'm looking to play straighter in the zone with this ball, because what I have in the bag now takes away the pocket from my comfort zone.

I'm hoping this blue will be "weaker" than the naturals I had few years back...
« Last Edit: September 12, 2015, 02:37:29 AM by xrayjay »
Does a round object have sides? I say yes, pizza has triangles..

aka addik since 2003

 

xrayjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2682
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2016, 12:35:49 PM »
Totally bone dry, I've had minor issue with the blue lately. I need some heads for my style and/or cover adjustment. I like this ball much better than other "modern" urethane I've owned in the past. it's def. a keeper for me.

What's the drill and surface you have it at?

OOB with 4x4x2
Does a round object have sides? I say yes, pizza has triangles..

aka addik since 2003

Hammerhead22

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2016, 01:31:33 PM »
4x4x2 is a stronger layout right?

I'll let you know when I throw mine on bone dry lanes and see if it can get through the heads with ease


BackToBasics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1110
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2016, 08:14:05 AM »
I actually love the Blue simply because it pushes slightly more than traditional urethane and recovers a tad better.  So I'm able to chase the line left a little and not sacrifice too much carry. I also can stay farther right as the heads go.

 I tried the Black Remake a few months ago and it was "ok" but my problem is that it hooked WAY too early and too much.  Forced me way too far left and thus defeated the purpose.  If I had plenty of head oil the Black would be better.

Plowboy300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2016, 09:05:01 AM »
I actually love the Blue simply because it pushes slightly more than traditional urethane and recovers a tad better.  So I'm able to chase the line left a little and not sacrifice too much carry. I also can stay farther right as the heads go.

 I tried the Black Remake a few months ago and it was "ok" but my problem is that it hooked WAY too early and too much.  Forced me way too far left and thus defeated the purpose.  If I had plenty of head oil the Black would be better.

Have you thought about changing the surface on the Black Hammer (2000), this might help the ball get down the lane a little more for you. I agree with your statement about the Black (remake) being a little too strong early, I changed the surface and it made a difference in the motion that I saw - a little longer down the lane. 

In regards to the Blue Hammer, this ball was weaker than it was designed to be. It is weaker than the Storm Naturals and that is actually a good thing. The only problem that I had with this ball was it was too weak for what I needed it to be, then when I changed the surface it hooked way to early and hit like a marshmellow for my game. The new Black Hammer definitely gives me that look I was looking for in a urethane ball & is very versatile for many patterns that we face in tournaments.

Hope this helps!
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 09:08:51 AM by Plowboy300 »
Michael Thompson
Hammer Amateur Staff Member

BackToBasics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1110
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #20 on: February 09, 2016, 10:23:43 AM »
I actually love the Blue simply because it pushes slightly more than traditional urethane and recovers a tad better.  So I'm able to chase the line left a little and not sacrifice too much carry. I also can stay farther right as the heads go.

 I tried the Black Remake a few months ago and it was "ok" but my problem is that it hooked WAY too early and too much.  Forced me way too far left and thus defeated the purpose.  If I had plenty of head oil the Black would be better.

Have you thought about changing the surface on the Black Hammer (2000), this might help the ball get down the lane a little more for you. I agree with your statement about the Black (remake) being a little too strong early, I changed the surface and it made a difference in the motion that I saw - a little longer down the lane. 

In regards to the Blue Hammer, this ball was weaker than it was designed to be. It is weaker than the Storm Naturals and that is actually a good thing. The only problem that I had with this ball was it was too weak for what I needed it to be, then when I changed the surface it hooked way to early and hit like a marshmellow for my game. The new Black Hammer definitely gives me that look I was looking for in a urethane ball & is very versatile for many patterns that we face in tournaments.

Hope this helps!

Yes I did.  Hit it up to 4000 and was able to polish a little.  But being that it's "true" urethane it still hooked too early. It worked better but it was still more sensitive to head breakdown than the Blue Hammer.  I could get at most 1 game out of it where with the Blue 2 almost 2.5 before having to make a huge change.

Don't get me wrong.   The Black rolls extremely well but it requires some head oil.  The centers I bowl do not use the modern oils so the fronts break down really quickly. 

xrayjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2682
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #21 on: February 09, 2016, 11:22:20 AM »
I've never tried it, but looking at my Blue Hammer coverstock, it looks like it'll be a challenge working the cover. So, I just deep clean often....
Does a round object have sides? I say yes, pizza has triangles..

aka addik since 2003

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2016, 01:23:26 PM »
I've never tried it, but looking at my Blue Hammer coverstock, it looks like it'll be a challenge working the cover. So, I just deep clean often....

The current one of the original?

If the current one, it is almost easier to change than most resins today, which just goes to show it can't be a true old urethane coverstock.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

xrayjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2682
Re: Blue hammer urethane
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2016, 02:11:50 PM »
I've never tried it, but looking at my Blue Hammer coverstock, it looks like it'll be a challenge working the cover. So, I just deep clean often....

The current one of the original?

If the current one, it is almost easier to change than most resins today, which just goes to show it can't be a true old urethane coverstock.

Good to know, I'll give it a try.
Does a round object have sides? I say yes, pizza has triangles..

aka addik since 2003