win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Is bowling ruined for good?  (Read 21484 times)

BeerLeague

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Is bowling ruined for good?
« on: January 18, 2017, 08:39:13 AM »
Not to beat a dead horse here, but it has been bugging me lately.

I see people averaging 220+ on "house" conditions, with no real versatility, and no game other than big revs. Their spare shooting sucks.  I see guys that can miss by 5 boards in or out and still crush the pocket.   The same guys can easily shoot 450 without the free hook outside and hold inside.

I also see guys in more competitive leagues, where the shot is intentionally challenging, bring a 20X average into a tourney and get pins.  These same guys can average 220+ on walls.  This hardly seems ethical and it hurts turnout.

I guess my point is ... Can we PLEASE get rid of wall shots?  I remember the local USBC/ABC office would run tapes regularly to check for illegal "block" shots, which are known as "walls" or "THS" today.  What happened?

The combination of reactive resin equipment, blocked walls, and pins that fly like crazy has turned bowling into parody of itself.  Shot making is no longer rewarded and accuracy seems to have taken a backseat to power.  If you have both, then you are deadly but us mere mortals cannot hit dimes while putting 500 RPM on the ball.... and that brings up the 2 handed / thumb-less argument which I will not engage in but I will say I believe it should be illegal.

I know its an old, worn out subject, but the game has been destroyed.  Some people will argue that it has evolved.  I reject that.  Where is the real test of skill?

I think we could take a lesson from the PGA .... they got rid of square grooves (to put premium on accuracy over power and hit fairways), and make anchored putting illegal (it gives the golfer a physical advantage).  You can draw the same parallels to bowling....
« Last Edit: January 18, 2017, 09:08:32 AM by BeerLeague »

 

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2017, 01:48:57 PM »
Short answer: YES
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

Good Times Good Times

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6462
  • INTJ Personality
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2017, 01:54:38 PM »
GTx2

bradl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2017, 02:02:07 PM »

Not hardly.  I just trying to start an objective discussion.

If you haven't noticed,bowling is almost extinct and the PBA is a joke.  I want the game to thrive.

You've never been outside of the country, have you?

If you have, you'd realize how much of a farce your statement is.

BL.

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2017, 02:05:04 PM »


 Ha ha ha, man I LOVE that for some reason.  🤗
Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

Good Times Good Times

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6462
  • INTJ Personality
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2017, 02:43:06 PM »
Ha ha ha, man I LOVE that for some reason.

This whole thread was started by member berries.....  ;)  :P  :P
GTx2

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #21 on: January 18, 2017, 03:21:55 PM »
Sounds like sour grapes from someone who averages 188 on house and got clobbered the night he composed this thread by someone who averages 220+.......



Not hardly.  I just trying to start an objective discussion.

If you haven't noticed,bowling is almost extinct and the PBA is a joke.  I want the game to thrive. 

Based on connecting this post to your previous posts in the thread, are you implying and or specifically stating that walled up shots and 2 handers are killing bowling?  That those two reasons are the reasons bowling is dying...
« Last Edit: January 18, 2017, 03:23:35 PM by LookingForALeftyWall »

bradl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #22 on: January 18, 2017, 03:25:53 PM »
Sounds like sour grapes from someone who averages 188 on house and got clobbered the night he composed this thread by someone who averages 220+.......



Not hardly.  I just trying to start an objective discussion.

If you haven't noticed,bowling is almost extinct and the PBA is a joke.  I want the game to thrive. 

Are you implying and or specifically stating that walled up shots and 2 handers are killing bowling?

Not only that, he is specifically stating that bowling is nearly dead, without even taking into account how many of our bowlers went over to Japan to compete, how many just finished the TeamUSA trials, how many in the next 2 weeks are coming up on Collegiate tournaments, the QubicaAMF World Cup, WTBA tournaments, PABCON, and possible inclusion in the Olympics.

But he's so narrowminded and narrow focused on what is happening to him that he states that it is nearly extinct. The scent of entitlement reeks worse than weed at a kim-chee festival.

Bowling nearly extinct? Hardly, bro. Hardly.

BL.

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #23 on: January 18, 2017, 04:56:04 PM »
Sounds like sour grapes from someone who averages 188 on house and got clobbered the night he composed this thread by someone who averages 220+.......



Not hardly.  I just trying to start an objective discussion.

If you haven't noticed,bowling is almost extinct and the PBA is a joke.  I want the game to thrive. 

Objective? Are you kidding? You want outlaw particular styles because in all likelihood you are unable to replicate said styles. That's not objective.
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

lilpossum1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #24 on: January 18, 2017, 05:13:53 PM »
Two handed and thumbless bowling shouldnt be banned. I have a teammate that can only bowl without a thumb because of breaking his hand so many times with work and sports. He can only throw the ball a few shots a night with a thumb before he is in pain. And his other hand is worse so switching hands is not an option.

milorafferty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11153
  • I have a name, therefore no preferred pronouns.
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #25 on: January 18, 2017, 05:32:12 PM »
Not to beat a dead horse here, but it has been bugging me lately.

I see people averaging 220+ on "house" conditions, with no real versatility, and no game other than big revs. Their spare shooting sucks.  I see guys that can miss by 5 boards in or out and still crush the pocket.   The same guys can easily shoot 450 without the free hook outside and hold inside.

I also see guys in more competitive leagues, where the shot is intentionally challenging, bring a 20X average into a tourney and get pins.  These same guys can average 220+ on walls.  This hardly seems ethical and it hurts turnout.

I guess my point is ... Can we PLEASE get rid of wall shots?  I remember the local USBC/ABC office would run tapes regularly to check for illegal "block" shots, which are known as "walls" or "THS" today.  What happened?

The combination of reactive resin equipment, blocked walls, and pins that fly like crazy has turned bowling into parody of itself.  Shot making is no longer rewarded and accuracy seems to have taken a backseat to power.  If you have both, then you are deadly but us mere mortals cannot hit dimes while putting 500 RPM on the ball.... and that brings up the 2 handed / thumb-less argument which I will not engage in but I will say I believe it should be illegal.

I know its an old, worn out subject, but the game has been destroyed.  Some people will argue that it has evolved.  I reject that.  Where is the real test of skill?

I think we could take a lesson from the PGA .... they got rid of square grooves (to put premium on accuracy over power and hit fairways), and make anchored putting illegal (it gives the golfer a physical advantage).  You can draw the same parallels to bowling....

So everyone should bowl on conditions where you feel you have an advantage and only using the style you use.

Please...
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

"If you don't stand for our flag, then don't expect me to give a damn about your feelings."

bradl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #26 on: January 18, 2017, 06:00:30 PM »
Not to beat a dead horse here, but it has been bugging me lately.

I see people averaging 220+ on "house" conditions, with no real versatility, and no game other than big revs. Their spare shooting sucks.  I see guys that can miss by 5 boards in or out and still crush the pocket.   The same guys can easily shoot 450 without the free hook outside and hold inside.

I also see guys in more competitive leagues, where the shot is intentionally challenging, bring a 20X average into a tourney and get pins.  These same guys can average 220+ on walls.  This hardly seems ethical and it hurts turnout.

I guess my point is ... Can we PLEASE get rid of wall shots?  I remember the local USBC/ABC office would run tapes regularly to check for illegal "block" shots, which are known as "walls" or "THS" today.  What happened?

The combination of reactive resin equipment, blocked walls, and pins that fly like crazy has turned bowling into parody of itself.  Shot making is no longer rewarded and accuracy seems to have taken a backseat to power.  If you have both, then you are deadly but us mere mortals cannot hit dimes while putting 500 RPM on the ball.... and that brings up the 2 handed / thumb-less argument which I will not engage in but I will say I believe it should be illegal.

I know its an old, worn out subject, but the game has been destroyed.  Some people will argue that it has evolved.  I reject that.  Where is the real test of skill?

I think we could take a lesson from the PGA .... they got rid of square grooves (to put premium on accuracy over power and hit fairways), and make anchored putting illegal (it gives the golfer a physical advantage).  You can draw the same parallels to bowling....

So everyone should bowl on conditions where you feel you have an advantage and only using the style you use.

Please...

Let's think about this the other way, and perhaps we should bowl on conditions where he feels he has the advantage. Because I'd guarantee that 80% - 90% of the people in this ruined-for-good, dying, close-to-extinct of a sport (his words) could work through what is giving him the advantage, and still beat and excel.

Then he would be left with nothing to complain about except himself in the mirror.

BL.

BigWillyStyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 897
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2017, 04:06:55 PM »
I see a lot of people jumping the OP for his comments. While I don't agree that 2 handed and/or thumbless releases give you an advantage ALL of the time; I do feel that the sport has become harder to validate correct averages at tournaments. I currently bowl in 2 houses, and the difference is night and day! I'll be going into City, State, and Nationals this year with about a 20-pin increase (due to the plus-10 rule) simply because I decided to branch out to another house for the first time in like 5 years. I'm still the same bowler, and bowling at this new house hasn't made me a better bowler per-se, but that's how it is. I'm not saying it's anyone else's fault, as I chose to bowl at the new location, just simply using my experience as an example of how averages can be greatly inaccurate as a foolproof method of judging someone's credibility.

With all that said, however, I'm not sure what the USBC could do about this. They've already established the Sport Bowling program, for individuals that would prefer a more challenging experience. I don't foresee USBC enforcing a weekly taping of lanes to make sure all shots comply, as that would be financially, well, ridiculous. Noone is gonna want to up there yearly sanction from $20 to like $100 just to bowl worse every week. THAT, would kill bowling.  :o

milorafferty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11153
  • I have a name, therefore no preferred pronouns.
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #28 on: January 19, 2017, 04:16:18 PM »
I see a lot of people jumping the OP for his comments. While I don't agree that 2 handed and/or thumbless releases give you an advantage ALL of the time; I do feel that the sport has become harder to validate correct averages at tournaments. I currently bowl in 2 houses, and the difference is night and day! I'll be going into City, State, and Nationals this year with about a 20-pin increase (due to the plus-10 rule) simply because I decided to branch out to another house for the first time in like 5 years. I'm still the same bowler, and bowling at this new house hasn't made me a better bowler per-se, but that's how it is. I'm not saying it's anyone else's fault, as I chose to bowl at the new location, just simply using my experience as an example of how averages can be greatly inaccurate as a foolproof method of judging someone's credibility.

With all that said, however, I'm not sure what the USBC could do about this. They've already established the Sport Bowling program, for individuals that would prefer a more challenging experience. I don't foresee USBC enforcing a weekly taping of lanes to make sure all shots comply, as that would be financially, well, ridiculous. Noone is gonna want to up there yearly sanction from $20 to like $100 just to bowl worse every week. THAT, would kill bowling.  :o

A few years ago, I submitted a white paper to USBC with a proposed solution to the problem and got a "thanks, but no thanks< email as a reply.

Here is my idea of a solution. Don't use averages for handicapping. Use how a bowler ranks among other bowlers in the same environment. For example, if your house had 100 bowlers and you were the 5th highest average in the house, you are in the top five percentile for that house. If you bowled more than one league average the league and it still works. Hard house house, sport shot, great wall of china it will still work out where the better bowlers will rise to the top.

With the USBC database, you could even rank houses against each other when bowlers completed any USBC sanctioned tournament. So if the top 10 bowlers from a high average house went to Nationals and sucked and the top 10 bowlers from a low average house went to Nationals and did well, you have a factor on how the houses compare.

USBC has years of data from houses, leagues, tournaments etc that could be mined to provide a system to create a better snapshot of a given bowlers ability.


Handicap would be figured on your percentile, not your average.
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

"If you don't stand for our flag, then don't expect me to give a damn about your feelings."

trash heap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #29 on: January 19, 2017, 05:22:38 PM »
My biggest issue with THS is how it creates this HUGE GAP for those who only bowl on it, and want to take their bowling to the next level.  That reality pill is very tough to take.

I know many bowlers that have decent skills, and I truly believe that would improve their game big time if they bowled on difficult patterns. Sure initially scores would go down, but in the end they would probably be back to their previous THS average or close to it.

Its just getting through the initial shock of it.


Talkin' Trash!

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
Re: Is bowling ruined for good?
« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2017, 05:53:28 PM »
There is nothing keeping anyone from practicing hitting what they are looking at.  If you can't hit what you're looking at while you practice there is no chance it is going to happen when the arrows come up on a demanding lane condition.  You have to want to become a better bowler to become a better bowler.