win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: USBC E-mail surveys  (Read 12270 times)

the_scarlet_pumpernickel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 8
USBC E-mail surveys
« on: April 19, 2017, 10:34:57 AM »
Did anyone else get one of these surveys about lane conditions, bowling equipment? you should check your e-mail to see if you got one. It asked a lot of questions about whether bowling was challenging enough, whether lane conditions are too easy. What is everyone's take on this survey? was it good enough? any questions you would have asked, not asked? did you even get it? do you think they will really use it's results to a positive end?

I think they are just confirming on paper what everyone already thinks. There's no way they don't know what bowlers have been saying about league vs. pro lane conditions, resin balls/dynamic cores being too strong, 2 handed good or bad etc... I would like to have seen more detailed questions about ball durability, which is arguably not as good anymore.
"Men do not fail... they give up trying"
~Fortune Cookie

 

tommygn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2017, 02:32:59 PM »
Center owners are trying to keep butts in the seats.  A decade ago our city had 6 bowling centers.  Now we have two.  Guess which two centers in town had the highest scores?  I'm a competitive bowler and I enjoy tough conditions, but I absolutely do not agree that forcing everyone to enjoy bowling one way is how anyone is going to fix things.  I don't see how making bowling less fun is the way to increase participation . .

You don't force "everyone" to bowl on hard conditions. You only award those that do, and allow those that want to bowl recreation, do just that, throw their un-realistic numbers without recognition.

 
God creates us with a blank canvas, and the "picture" we paint is up to us. Paint a picture you like and love!

tommygn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2017, 02:38:20 PM »
If it was actually that easy, it would already be happening, would it not? 

You would have to run tapes of the lanes proving the pattern, and be subject to spot checks and verification. If you are found out of compliance, all honor scores that were bowled for the season are subsequently deemed illegitimate. Basically, you make a punishment for failure to comply a "worth while" reason to stay in compliance. If all of sudden, you have league bowlers loosing their "award-able scores" because the bowling center wants to cheat, well then you will have some very angry bowlers and that would affect the proprietors bottom line. If you affect money, you will see centers staying in compliance.

I don't agree that it would be "impossible" to enforce.

It could be, if the USBC would actually take the time to fix some of the real issues that are affecting bowling, instead of these ridiculous issues like hiding the patterns, and not allowing practice on lanes before bowling.

Fix what the real problems are.

Sorry people, but when 12 year old kids are "out scoring" adults, you can't market that to corporate America as a "good" thing, and show that bowling has integrity, and then sell the product. When you watch someone bowl, you should be able to tell if they are a professional, or an amateur, and their score should reflect that. Today, it's the other way around, your score says if you are good or not, even though people that can score, can't hit the same spot twice in three games.
God creates us with a blank canvas, and the "picture" we paint is up to us. Paint a picture you like and love!

tommygn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2017, 02:46:52 PM »
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.

Scores keep getting higher and higher, yet we keep loosing bowlers. We encourage people to throw it "anyway" they want, yet we keep loosing bowlers.

Seems insane to me. Just my .02
God creates us with a blank canvas, and the "picture" we paint is up to us. Paint a picture you like and love!

ITZPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2017, 02:57:41 PM »
I have to disagree.  League bowling is much different from tournament bowling.  The idea that all league bowling has to have "integrity" and has to be on shots that "keep you honest" and form and mechanics should indicate skill simply isn't true.  Bowling is suffering because no one is having fun anymore.  It's become a collection of stiffs, egos, elitists who try to be as condescending and judgmental as possible.  I wholeheartedly disagree that league conditions should be made harder.  The USBC member average is something like 175, but for some reason everyone, themselves included, think it should only be about the scratch bowler, and that's the only demographic they care about.  If conditions get harder, you make 10% of the membership base happy and piss the other 90% off.  I can't imagine telling leagues full of 170-200 average bowlers that bowl for fun once a week that the conditions are now being made harder and are going to be enforced.  If there's a sure way to kill off league bowling and drive USBC into bankruptcy, that's it. 

If it was actually that easy, it would already be happening, would it not? 

You would have to run tapes of the lanes proving the pattern, and be subject to spot checks and verification. If you are found out of compliance, all honor scores that were bowled for the season are subsequently deemed illegitimate. Basically, you make a punishment for failure to comply a "worth while" reason to stay in compliance. If all of sudden, you have league bowlers loosing their "award-able scores" because the bowling center wants to cheat, well then you will have some very angry bowlers and that would affect the proprietors bottom line. If you affect money, you will see centers staying in compliance.

I don't agree that it would be "impossible" to enforce.

It could be, if the USBC would actually take the time to fix some of the real issues that are affecting bowling, instead of these ridiculous issues like hiding the patterns, and not allowing practice on lanes before bowling.

Fix what the real problems are.

Sorry people, but when 12 year old kids are "out scoring" adults, you can't market that to corporate America as a "good" thing, and show that bowling has integrity, and then sell the product. When you watch someone bowl, you should be able to tell if they are a professional, or an amateur, and their score should reflect that. Today, it's the other way around, your score says if you are good or not, even though people that can score, can't hit the same spot twice in three games.
Storm Amateur Staff
Turbo Regional Staff

spmcgivern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2079
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2017, 02:59:54 PM »
Enforcement could be an issue, but if a league says we are a rec league there is nothing to enforce.  If a league says we are a "though pattern" league then local associations should randomly check the league/center for compliance. We pay the local association too and at least here they don't do much.

Center owners need to be held responsible.  They created the problem by going soft patterns thus taking us down this rabbit hole.  They are members of the BPAA and that could/should be an enforcement arm.

If they (USBC) are trying to change things based on this survey than I applaud them. 

just my 2 cents

How is this any different than what was done when sport shot leagues first came about?  If given the option, bowlers will not consistently bowl on more difficult shots.

As far as center owners/managers causing this issue, I can't see that.  ABC set the standard years ago and the center owners/managers are still abiding by those rules.

ITZPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2017, 03:08:06 PM »
Just because something is happening at the same time something else is doesn't mean it's a cause or contribution.  This is the scratch bowler mindset because it's all that matters to them.  Bowling isn't declining because we're losing scratch bowlers, we're losing casual bowlers.  Scratch bowlers are the ones sticking around complaining about all this.  The die hards will always be around no matter what.  Membership hasn't dropped this far because we lost all the scratch bowlers.  Bowling is expensive and time consuming, and with so many other places for time and money to go, bowling has become not worth it for those who weren't that into it in the first place. 

I'll never understand the idea that making bowler harder and more competitive and more serious is the solution to bringing in new casual bowlers or bringing back those who have quit. 

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.

Scores keep getting higher and higher, yet we keep loosing bowlers. We encourage people to throw it "anyway" they want, yet we keep loosing bowlers.

Seems insane to me. Just my .02
Storm Amateur Staff
Turbo Regional Staff

ITZPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2017, 03:15:08 PM »
Yes and yes.  The most valid point is what people select when given the choice.  Scratch leagues are disappearing, and sport/PBA leagues usually only exist during the summer, so why does ANYONE think that forcing people into something they have not chosen or have voted against time and time again is the answer?  "Well since you aren't choosing to do this like you're supposed to, we're just going to force it on you now."  Competitive bowling and league bowling are two different things, and if you try to make them the same, you'll drive off 90% of your remaining membership.

Enforcement could be an issue, but if a league says we are a rec league there is nothing to enforce.  If a league says we are a "though pattern" league then local associations should randomly check the league/center for compliance. We pay the local association too and at least here they don't do much.

Center owners need to be held responsible.  They created the problem by going soft patterns thus taking us down this rabbit hole.  They are members of the BPAA and that could/should be an enforcement arm.

If they (USBC) are trying to change things based on this survey than I applaud them. 

just my 2 cents

How is this any different than what was done when sport shot leagues first came about?  If given the option, bowlers will not consistently bowl on more difficult shots.

As far as center owners/managers causing this issue, I can't see that.  ABC set the standard years ago and the center owners/managers are still abiding by those rules.
Storm Amateur Staff
Turbo Regional Staff

Olderdude

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2017, 03:45:53 PM »
Enforcement could be an issue, but if a league says we are a rec league there is nothing to enforce.  If a league says we are a "though pattern" league then local associations should randomly check the league/center for compliance. We pay the local association too and at least here they don't do much.

Center owners need to be held responsible.  They created the problem by going soft patterns thus taking us down this rabbit hole.  They are members of the BPAA and that could/should be an enforcement arm.

If they (USBC) are trying to change things based on this survey than I applaud them. 

just my 2 cents

How is this any different than what was done when sport shot leagues first came about?  If given the option, bowlers will not consistently bowl on more difficult shots.

As far as center owners/managers causing this issue, I can't see that.  ABC set the standard years ago and the center owners/managers are still abiding by those rules.

It's not any different, that's why it should be able to be done

ABC/USBC change the requirement from what I remember because the owners wanted more bowlers and lax standards
« Last Edit: April 20, 2017, 03:50:41 PM by Olderdude »

ITZPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2017, 04:20:43 PM »
Why again is this so important for league bowling?  Tournament bowling, sure, totally on board for that, but why does regular old league bowling need to be run like the US Open?  You do realize the competitive bowling community is destroying what they're trying to save, correct? 
Storm Amateur Staff
Turbo Regional Staff

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2017, 04:25:34 PM »
League participation isn't in the crapper because of lane conditions or anything the USBC has done or hasn't done or will try to do.  Participation is down because 90% of bowling centers are terribly run business'.  They are still run by people that think league bowlers are just going to sign up because you put a schedule on the counter, and most haven't been cleaned since 1989.

tburky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2017, 04:27:26 PM »
I would like to see tougher conditions. However, I'm in the minority which realistically is 5% of the bowlers. Although I don't care for easy house shots, this is what bowling has become over the years. I have accepted easy conditions and whenever there is a chance to bowl on a sport shot I do. As for forcing people to bowl on tougher shots will be the end of sanctioning.

ITZPS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2017, 06:10:26 PM »
Absolutely the best point in this whole thread.  That's exactly the reason. 

League participation isn't in the crapper because of lane conditions or anything the USBC has done or hasn't done or will try to do.  Participation is down because 90% of bowling centers are terribly run business'.  They are still run by people that think league bowlers are just going to sign up because you put a schedule on the counter, and most haven't been cleaned since 1989.
Storm Amateur Staff
Turbo Regional Staff

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2017, 06:35:49 PM »
Center owners are trying to keep butts in the seats.  A decade ago our city had 6 bowling centers.  Now we have two.  Guess which two centers in town had the highest scores?  I'm a competitive bowler and I enjoy tough conditions, but I absolutely do not agree that forcing everyone to enjoy bowling one way is how anyone is going to fix things.  I don't see how making bowling less fun is the way to increase participation . .

You don't force "everyone" to bowl on hard conditions. You only award those that do, and allow those that want to bowl recreation, do just that, throw their un-realistic numbers without recognition.

 

This elitist, dismissive attitude is the crux of the problem. Bowlers are great at making other bowlers feel "less than". When In the grand scheme of things, bowling is incredibly dorky.
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2017, 08:08:03 PM »
When we realize that the GAME of bowling is laughable at best and the SPORT of bowling is something that will probably never catch on with our generation since we're all a bunch of entitled aholes and need to have our frail egos tended to by phony inflated numbers that make us feel better about who we are, the better.

milorafferty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11152
  • I have a name, therefore no preferred pronouns.
Re: USBC E-mail surveys
« Reply #30 on: April 21, 2017, 12:48:14 AM »
When we realize that the GAME of bowling is laughable at best and the SPORT of bowling is something that will probably never catch on with our generation since we're all a bunch of entitled aholes and need to have our frail egos tended to by phony inflated numbers that make us feel better about who we are, the better.

Sounds like SOMEONE needs a safe space... :-)
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

"If you don't stand for our flag, then don't expect me to give a damn about your feelings."