win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl  (Read 2868 times)

thewhiz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« on: January 20, 2017, 02:47:51 PM »
How does a ec compare to the nrp?
Logged

 

pears

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2017, 02:38:51 PM »
somebody chime in on this please, I'm wondering as well
Logged
Snap lock-16
Code black-16
Eternal cell-16

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2017, 02:48:24 PM »
In the simplest terms, the Eternal Cell has a less angular ball motion than the No Rules Pearl. 
Logged

pears

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2017, 03:06:57 PM »
Quote from: LookingForALeftyWall on February 08, 2017, 02:48:24 PM
In the simplest terms, the Eternal Cell has a less angular ball motion than the No Rules Pearl.

So more mid than back end motion is what Im assuming.
Logged
Snap lock-16
Code black-16
Eternal cell-16

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2017, 04:02:39 PM »
Quote from: pears on February 08, 2017, 03:06:57 PM
Quote from: LookingForALeftyWall on February 08, 2017, 02:48:24 PM
In the simplest terms, the Eternal Cell has a less angular ball motion than the No Rules Pearl.

So more mid than back end motion is what Im assuming.

Yes.  EC acts more like a typical dull ball than a typical polished ball.  I think that's why a lot of house bowlers did not like it (reaction just wasn't violent enough).
Logged

leftybowler70

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2017, 09:52:06 PM »
I seen this exact reaction from bowlers who used it at my local houses before getting rid of them.
Logged

pears

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2017, 10:08:33 PM »
Quote from: leftybowler70 on February 08, 2017, 09:52:06 PM
I seen this exact reaction from bowlers who used it at my local houses before getting rid of them.

Im looking to try one in 16lb if you here of anyone not liking theirs
Logged
Snap lock-16
Code black-16
Eternal cell-16

Good Times Good Times

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6462
  • INTJ Personality
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2017, 07:55:21 AM »
Eternal Cell is a great ball for me on flatter patterns as it is great in the mid-lane.  I know what you all are talking about with regards to the ball motion but I do keep surface on it and it's more of a tournament ball for me.  It does excel at that and it's a valuable motion to have in the bag. 

For house conditions though, it may not be the most recommended.  That doesn't make it a bad ball by any means though.  It a fantastic ball for what it is.  For those who didn't like it, I'm not sure why exactly they were expecting a THS killer.....
Logged
GTx2

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: Eternal Cell vs. No Rules Pearl
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2017, 08:57:24 AM »
Quote from: LookingForALeftyWall on February 08, 2017, 04:02:39 PM
Quote from: pears on February 08, 2017, 03:06:57 PM
Quote from: LookingForALeftyWall on February 08, 2017, 02:48:24 PM
In the simplest terms, the Eternal Cell has a less angular ball motion than the No Rules Pearl.

So more mid than back end motion is what Im assuming.

Yes.  EC acts more like a typical dull ball than a typical polished ball.  I think that's why a lot of house bowlers did not like it (reaction just wasn't violent enough).
Agreed. I got bashed for making such a comment. Glad I'm not the only one that saw it differently in their area.
Logged
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl
Pages: [1]
« previous next »