win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: 74 Response vs. F74  (Read 7787 times)

earlyrolling

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
74 Response vs. F74
« on: May 23, 2016, 03:07:19 AM »
Is the 74 Response Pearl by 900 Global simply a clone of AMF's F74 Hybrid cover (but without the solid component)?

Wondering how close these covers would be to each other (pearl to pearl, hybrid to hybrid, etc.)?

Thanks.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2016, 03:11:15 AM by earlyrolling »

 

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2016, 07:43:15 AM »
I assumed it was the storm additive..
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2016, 01:46:11 PM »
I thought F74 and 74 response were the same covers but I could be wrong.
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

earlyrolling

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2016, 04:00:49 PM »
Any 900 Global or AMF Reps that can state definitively here?

Curt_Dupre

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 418
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2016, 09:25:12 AM »
Billdozer is correct. When 900 Global had their high performance balls poured in Utah, we didn't use SXX on these balls. We used a number then had alert, response and dig behind them. Basically it was the storm additive in the cover. Now, 900 Global's plant can do it all. So basically all of our covers will use the same product as Storm uses. Cover additives will  be different, but urethane base will come from the same place. Hope this helps.
Motiv Regional Staff
Vise Regional Staff
Mouse's Bowling Garage

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2016, 12:15:26 AM »
So does that mean f74 is now the same as response 74?
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

Curt_Dupre

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 418
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2016, 03:16:50 PM »
So does that mean f74 is now the same as response 74?
It may be close, the only problem is the last time we used F74 was with the Pure Adrenaline which was poured last year. I would say look at our newer ones going forward to be closer. Great Escape has a new F80 solid cover. This ball is also 3 colors which means the 900 Global plant has been upgraded to do 3 color bowling balls since the Dream Big Pearl and Respect Solid. So if a new AMF ball comes out now with an F74 coverstock, it may be close to the 74 response cover found on the Respect Pearl.
Motiv Regional Staff
Vise Regional Staff
Mouse's Bowling Garage

bowlingman817

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 639
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2016, 04:34:52 PM »
Would love to see a vid or 2 of the great escape. I'm actually favoring that ball over the inception.

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2016, 06:25:15 PM »
My mistake. I thought the Escape used F74.
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: 74 Response vs. F74
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2016, 08:02:44 PM »
Great Escape has F80 on it. Escape has f74 hybrid.