I agree the break pearl and the creature pearl are better looking bowling balls because they are pearl. But you still have the same goofy/lame name and logo. They had a lot better luck on average when they were amf/columbia/track/dynothane/circle.......300.
I was really looking forward to seeing what they had to offer when I heard about the company knowing all the experience they had from their previous companies, and to see the first release of the creature and the break was not something impressive to look at. I'm not saying they have to put hologram pics on the ball or anything it can be simple and still look great. But this is more of a simple not so great look.
I think(just my opinnion) had they come out with something better looking and named they would have really sparked some more intrest in the company then what they have. Take the break solid and pearl, give it a more catchy name and different logo and there maybe a lot more people throwing the equipment.
Quick added survey, everybody think of a couple of your favorite bowlingballs you've owned over the years from the early to mid 90s to now and list them. Get an idea of what people really like over the years.
Brunswick Zone series. Track Synergy series. Track Sensor seires. Quantums. Ebonite cat and wolf series from the mid 90s.(red wolf solid/pearl jaguar, stingray, puma ect) The Columbia Piranha and Cuda series. Columbia Boss Series.
--------------------
" hand, don't step on the lanes without some "
