BallReviews

Equipment Boards => 900 Global => Topic started by: elvismat on January 14, 2009, 03:54:49 AM

Title: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
Post by: elvismat on January 14, 2009, 03:54:49 AM

I have a Break and was looking for something stronger for oil.  From what I've observed, the two best hooking balls for heavy oiled lanes with carry down, is the Bounty and the Virtual Gravity.  Does anybody know, which one is better?  My pap is 5 5/8's, with 5/8's up, I'm more of a tweener, with about 16 mph, avg'ing around 220 in every league.

All replies are welcomed.

Thanks..

Title: Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
Post by: missed messenger on January 15, 2009, 10:12:02 AM

Not even close, the VG is way better and more on the backend then the Bounty

Title: Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
Post by: mainzer on January 15, 2009, 10:15:46 AM

How do you know a Bounty and VG are the best in oil? I would say the best in oil with out question is the Ntense LevRG. I would go with Bounty btw if I had to choose between the two but open to any oiler go with Ntense any day.
--------------------
''If their is a life after death,
  then their is no death,
  and if their is no death,
  we do not live''
                   

Progressive Metal Band
EVERGREY


MainzerPower

Title: Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
Post by: tenpin on January 16, 2009, 05:59:31 AM

Well if you not sure about the Bounty there is always the new AMF release.  I am sure this one is going to handle oil better than the VG and the NTense.
http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=225206&ForumID=1&CategoryID=2
http://www.amf300.com/index.cfm?p=balls&bid=43
--------------------
Derek Trowbridge
900 Global:No oil pattern we can't tame
www.900global.com
www.AMF300.com