BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Bags, Shoes, Accessories => Topic started by: lefty50 on May 23, 2019, 06:33:52 PM
-
Has anyone else heard the theory that a shammy is actually an abrasive and as such smooths the surface faster than a microfiber cloth? I tested it at state tournament this last weekend and it seemed to be true (in a totally unscientific test of course)....
-
I think the fact that you can feel the "resistance" as you clean the oil off might add some credibility to the idea, however, I would not categorize mine as an abrasive. By the same token the friction on the back end of the lane also has a "smoothing" effect on the ball's surface but we don't think of it as abrasive.
Anyone else?
-
I think anytime you have a harder surface {the lane} in contact w/ a softer surface { the ball} you'll have an abrasive action. It may be minimal, more like a burnishing effect. That's why the balls surface gets lane shined & lower grit finishes don't last as long. As far as a shammy, that would be a softer surface than the ball. There is friction there but I think the ball would be smoothing/burnishing the shammy not the other way around. my 2 cents FWIW??
-
Paper can change ball surface. Any towel etc can likely do the same but at what rate is hard to say. Test it on a ball spinner and see if you can get a visible difference
-
Put a dull ball on a spinner and hit it with a chamois for a while.. It will change the surface.
-
Put a dull ball on a spinner and hit it with a chamois for a while.. It will change the surface.
Of the chamois or the ball? ;D
-
Anyone remember about 5-6 years back when the PBA was considering banning the use of Micro-fiber cloths during competition because they also were "rough" enough to change the surface of a ball?
I'd bet few remember that because the idea was dropped.
Think of the shammy in the same way.
-
Anyone remember about 5-6 years back when the PBA was considering banning the use of Micro-fiber cloths during competition because they also were "rough" enough to change the surface of a ball?
I'd bet few remember that because the idea was dropped.
Think of the shammy in the same way.
If someone wants to try to change the surface of a ball during competition with a shammy Or microfiber towel, they deserve the unfair advantage. That would be too much work for any noticeable difference
-
Anyone remember about 5-6 years back when the PBA was considering banning the use of Micro-fiber cloths during competition because they also were "rough" enough to change the surface of a ball?
I'd bet few remember that because the idea was dropped.
Think of the shammy in the same way.
If someone wants to try to change the surface of a ball during competition with a shammy Or microfiber towel, they deserve the unfair advantage. That would be too much work for any noticeable difference
... And they'd get REALLY BIG muscles!
-
Anyone remember about 5-6 years back when the PBA was considering banning the use of Micro-fiber cloths during competition because they also were "rough" enough to change the surface of a ball?
I'd bet few remember that because the idea was dropped.
Think of the shammy in the same way.
If someone wants to try to change the surface of a ball during competition with a shammy Or microfiber towel, they deserve the unfair advantage. That would be too much work for any noticeable difference
... And they'd get REALLY BIG muscles!
They would also probably look like they skipped leg day lol. If somebody is going to try that hard to cheat, they probably aren’t even good enough to take advantage of the slight advantage it would give them. Usually, if a person feels the need to cheat, they aren’t good enough to win even while cheating