win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: AI vs Ravage  (Read 1497 times)

Law

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
AI vs Ravage
« on: February 22, 2005, 12:33:39 AM »
How much stronger do you think the AI is versus the Ravage?  I'm thinking of adding one to my bag, but I never see much heavy oil out there.  I would drill the AI to go long and arc into the pocket rather than have it snap.

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: AI vs Ravage
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2005, 08:11:33 PM »
Compare AI to WMB (as more of an apples to apples comparison).
and
Ravage to Bruiser (Ravage more flippy, in general)

AI is much earlier with less flippiness (same drilling, box surface), and handles more oil, a level more, I'd guess.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

a_ak57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10584
Re: AI vs Ravage
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2005, 08:21:49 PM »
As the others have said, the AI will be earlier, and be able to handle more oil than the ravage, if left in box condition drilled the same.
--------------------
- Andy

Law

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
Re: AI vs Ravage
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2005, 08:52:39 PM »
Thanks for the replies.  I had an UI, which I had to sell since it was just too strong for what I see.  This past week in league, whereas I usually use a Sonic X, I had to revert to my Ravage with slower ball speed and a higher rev rate.  I was thinking of the AI as being a ball to throw to complement my current two ball arsenal.  It would be one notch above the Ravage, whereas the UI may have been two notches above.

a_ak57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10584
Re: AI vs Ravage
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2005, 08:56:12 PM »
IF you wanted it to be one notch above, instead of two like the UI, then you've got the right ball for the job.
--------------------
- Andy