BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: Kyobou7 on March 09, 2017, 08:58:51 AM

Title: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Kyobou7 on March 09, 2017, 08:58:51 AM
Now that the Vintage Lt-48 is discontinued (and I can't find it anywhere on closeout), anyone have any ideas on what a viable replacement would be?
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Brunswick_fan_BrandonH on March 10, 2017, 07:02:34 AM
A Brunswick Rhino would be similar reaction but a little weaker overall. Also, the Rhino would have more of a skid / snap type of reaction because of the pearl coverstock. Another choice would be a DV8 Outcast which has similar numbers to the Vintage LT-48.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: BrunsNick on March 10, 2017, 07:16:33 AM
After I shined up my pin down Fanatic BTU, it is very close to a pin down LT48. Pin up vs Pin up is a different story, the LT48 flares and hooks a bit more.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Brandon Riley on March 10, 2017, 06:44:30 PM
The DV8 Dude is as close as you'll get to the LT48 but that gem will also be hard to find
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Snakster on March 10, 2017, 07:29:05 PM
Slight premium, but you can replace.

http://www.gebhardtsbowling.com/bowling-balls/brunswick-lt-48-bowling-ball (http://www.gebhardtsbowling.com/bowling-balls/brunswick-lt-48-bowling-ball)
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Kyobou7 on March 11, 2017, 10:55:19 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  I am looking at the BTU as a possible in the urethane category, so maybe I'll give that a try.  Snakster, I can live without for that price.  That's just nutty to spend for a ball that was $95-$99 online at one point.  I don't need it that bad :o
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: leftybowler70 on March 11, 2017, 11:09:32 PM
+1 on the dv8 dude, as close as your gonna get to the Lt-48.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: charlest on March 12, 2017, 05:55:45 AM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  I am looking at the BTU as a possible in the urethane category, so maybe I'll give that a try.  Snakster, I can live without for that price.  That's just nutty to spend for a ball that was $95-$99 online at one point.  I don't need it that bad :o

The BTU is not urethane. While it has a urethane-like reaction in overall smoothness, it is most definitely a resin and hooks a nice amount.

Gasoline was once 25 cents a gallon. Does its current price mean you will never buy gasoline again? Buy what you can afford for what you want. Let the past stay in the past. If balls went up in price like cars, the ball you bought in 1993 when resins first came out would now cost $500.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: leftybowler70 on March 12, 2017, 07:21:26 AM
+1
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Snakster on March 12, 2017, 12:39:37 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  I am looking at the BTU as a possible in the urethane category, so maybe I'll give that a try.  Snakster, I can live without for that price.  That's just nutty to spend for a ball that was $95-$99 online at one point.  I don't need it that bad :o

Don't blame you.  I'd feel the same.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: BrunsNick on March 12, 2017, 01:04:59 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  I am looking at the BTU as a possible in the urethane category, so maybe I'll give that a try.  Snakster, I can live without for that price.  That's just nutty to spend for a ball that was $95-$99 online at one point.  I don't need it that bad :o

The BTU is not urethane. While it has a urethane-like reaction in overall smoothness, it is most definitely a resin and hooks a nice amount.

Gasoline was once 25 cents a gallon. Does its current price mean you will never buy gasoline again? Buy what you can afford for what you want. Let the past stay in the past. If balls went up in price like cars, the ball you bought in 1993 when resins first came out would now cost $500.

I don't agree with this analogy. There's a difference between inflation and this, otherwise a plastic ball from 1993 NIB would go for 100's as well.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: charlest on March 12, 2017, 01:49:05 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  I am looking at the BTU as a possible in the urethane category, so maybe I'll give that a try.  Snakster, I can live without for that price.  That's just nutty to spend for a ball that was $95-$99 online at one point.  I don't need it that bad :o

The BTU is not urethane. While it has a urethane-like reaction in overall smoothness, it is most definitely a resin and hooks a nice amount.

Gasoline was once 25 cents a gallon. Does its current price mean you will never buy gasoline again? Buy what you can afford for what you want. Let the past stay in the past. If balls went up in price like cars, the ball you bought in 1993 when resins first came out would now cost $500.

I don't agree with this analogy. There's a difference between inflation and this, otherwise a plastic ball from 1993 NIB would go for 100's as well.

I'm trying to convince him to buy the BTU and you're contradicting me. :)

Inflation affects gas, milk and bowling balls, but Bowling has kept the price of balls more than reasonable.
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: BrunsNick on March 12, 2017, 02:07:50 PM
It sounded like you were trying to convince him to pay the extra for the Lt48 based off of the gasoline analogy. My mistake then. Carry on :)
Title: Re: LT-48 replacement
Post by: Kyobou7 on March 12, 2017, 02:59:02 PM
Charlest, it's working ;D.  I plan on buying the BTU once my money straightens up.