win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Brunsnick?  (Read 3875 times)

Dangerzone85

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11
Brunsnick?
« on: April 04, 2005, 05:07:33 AM »
i was wanted to know how u like you impulse zone the layout and a video of how it rolled . Im thinking bout getting 1 for next season let me know


if anybody has his video then post em
Logged

 

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2005, 02:20:56 PM »
http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/wNjkxODAzNnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D
VIDEO

http://home.earthlink.net/~dcsportlxi/arsenal/impulse.jpg
LAYOUT

Works great for me when the backends are flying, shined up, it becomes a more versatile ball for house patterns.
--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-05
¡Viva la nación de Brunswick!
Logged
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2005, 02:39:15 PM »
Nick,

no dis-respect here...but....pin above bridge, psa in the strong position (for the most part) helps w/ flying backends?

or am I reading this wrong?
--------------------
JEFF
"Oh...that's puce"
 Sully; Monsters, Inc.
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2005, 03:01:47 PM »
It is a low load particle with a weighole so that should smoothen out the pattern.  I've seen a few Impulses smoothen out fresh backends.  Attribute it to Activator Particle.  That's a great coverstock.

....now only if they made an N'Control based low load particle.  Can you say Smmmmooooooooth?
--------------------
-DP3
...
Logged

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2005, 03:14:40 PM »
quote:
Nick,

no dis-respect here...but....pin above bridge, psa in the strong position (for the most part) helps w/ flying backends?

or am I reading this wrong?
--------------------
JEFF
"Oh...that's puce"
 Sully; Monsters, Inc.


ANYTHING particle for me will smooth out backends, this one has a nice X-hole on my PAP. It is also great for shorter patterns in general when I need less in the backend.
--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-05
¡Viva la nación de Brunswick!
Logged
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2005, 03:19:45 PM »
quote:
Nick,

no dis-respect here...but....pin above bridge, psa in the strong position (for the most part) helps w/ flying backends?

or am I reading this wrong?


Does the same for me as well.
--------------------
Better to be a big fish in a small pond than not to be a big fish at all.

Horrid in Doubles, torrid in Singles...
...that's The Curse of Dusty.
Logged
#TweetYourScores

TheDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3170
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2005, 09:52:59 PM »
particle and lower diff make this as smooth as they come.

jeffrevs how can you forget coverstock is most important, layout secondary. cg making up a ultimately small percentage of reaction.
--------------------
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shop
Montreal, Quebec.
Logged
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shops
LaSalle, Quebec-Located inside Pont Mercier Lanes.
Keep them honest!

Ebay store updated very often: http://stores.ebay.com/gumby3170?refid+store

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2005, 06:40:40 AM »
quote:
particle and lower diff make this as smooth as they come.

jeffrevs how can you forget coverstock is most important, layout secondary. cg making up a ultimately small percentage of reaction.
--------------------
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shop
Montreal, Quebec.


Tim, I didn't ....but have you seen Nick's videos...the guy shreds the ball...so I thought....that drill, that speed, that many revs = snap.....but didn't look at the whole equation.....

my fault.... *runs and hides*  

Thanks Nick
--------------------
JEFF
"Oh...that's puce"
 Sully; Monsters, Inc.


Edited on 4/5/2005 6:35 AM
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2005, 09:50:44 AM »
If you watch his video for the Impulse it's obvious the thing is smooth from many different angles lol.  Maybe you should have watched it first?
--------------------
-DP3
...
Logged

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2005, 09:54:57 AM »
quote:
If you watch his video for the Impulse it's obvious the thing is smooth from many different angles lol.  Maybe you should have watched it first?
--------------------
-DP3
...


DP, don't be a smarta55 kia ....
I've seen it....and I did watch it....but that does'nt mean the condition he's throwing it on in the video is the same he's discussing....
--------------------
JEFF
"I don't want to be a butt-inski, but what exactly is going on here ?"


Edited on 4/5/2005 9:49 AM
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2005, 10:00:26 AM »
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be funny....maybe I should have put some sort of smiley faces in there or something so you could tell the tone I was typing that in.  Why is it an argument about the lane conditions now when your comment about the ball's reaction before was based on layout?

I'm pretty sure everyone in this thread can attest to saying that the low load particle can smooth out the reaction regardless of drilling, and when you put an X-hole on the PAP, you get an even smoother reaction.  To the original poster, I would get the ball, it's an awesome piece by brunswick, and I think they should use the Activator Particle cover more.  

You can't just attribute a layout to what the ball is going to do, that's only a tweak of the reaction.  I could drill a Goliath with the Pin over the bridge, C.G in palm, that doesn't mean it's going to go long and make a left turn lucy(but then again, in my hands....it might be interesting)
--------------------
-DP3
...
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2005, 10:01:31 AM »
Nice Edit btw.
--------------------
-DP3
...
Logged

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2005, 10:47:13 AM »
quote:
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be funny....maybe I should have put some sort of smiley faces in there or something so you could tell the tone I was typing that in.
fair enough

quote:
Why is it an argument about the lane conditions now when your comment about the ball's reaction before was based on layout?


no one is arguing ....re-read my original post...it's directly related to what Nick said and I explained what I meant in post 2.  He said this ball is good for when backends are flying....that's what prompted my original comment, so a lane condition was ALWAYS a part of this......

quote:
I'm pretty sure everyone in this thread can attest to saying that the low load particle can smooth out the reaction regardless of drilling, and when you put an X-hole on the PAP, you get an even smoother reaction.


Sure...see that now....I just thought of Nicks speed and revs, saw the drill and again, like I said, didn't put it all together at the time...

You can't just attribute a layout to what the ball is going to do, that's only a tweak of the reaction.  I could drill a Goliath with the Pin over the bridge, C.G in palm, that doesn't mean it's going to go long and make a left turn lucy(but then again, in my hands....it might be interesting)
[/quote]

there is a part of what I was thinking....the player has some affect on what happens too...

far too much discussion about this for such a miniscule comment

OH...by the way...the edit didn't change anything...I just said the same thing in a different context
--------------------
JEFF
"I don't want to be a butt-inski, but what exactly is going on here ?"


Edited on 4/5/2005 10:41 AM
Logged

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2005, 02:07:14 PM »
quote:
Your Impulse looks different. Is it a first run?


Yep! I think they is purdy-er-er...
--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-05
¡Viva la nación de Brunswick!
Logged
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

recognize_talent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: Brunsnick?
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2005, 03:25:41 PM »
your all wack. fighting over a ball. just go buy the darn thing.

--------------------
"Strikes show them you know the game. Spares show them you can play the game."

When you bowl a 300, then you have a little sense of what it is like to be Jesus Christ.

A wise man knows when he is beat, it's time you RECOGNIZE Talent!!!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »