win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: fury = better than I thought.  (Read 2593 times)

TECH SUPPORT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 982
fury = better than I thought.
« on: February 26, 2007, 11:20:45 PM »
Well after struggling with the idea of selling the fury or trying to plugg and redrill or manipulate the cover/weight hole I decided to polish it. I was haveing bad trouble with the ball not hooking or finishing, I was getting massive amounts of flare but very little movement. I had only thrown the ball 4-5 times with no luck. A quick inspection of the cover/flare rings led me to belive i had the dreaded over flareing problem I run into when I drill stronger balls with a medium rg layout. I finaly got the chance to throw some ruff buff on it last night before league and was really suprised at the new found reaction of this strong cover and core combination. I was able to open the lane up with it and did shoot 300 the first game. This is the first time I have had a chance to use the ball in league and thought it to be great on the fresh but not sure on the transitioning side. I am going to leave it at ruff buff for now untill after tonight when I see how it works on a touch slicker pair of lanes in my mens league. i will then know what my options are with the surface and weight hole location to get it to store energy a touch better. If i do put a weight hole in it I am thinking about 1-2" inside of my pap to bring it back to 1/2 oz side, the ball has 7/8 side 3/4 finger as it sits. Will post back after tonight to update.

 

MIBowler

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2007, 08:08:16 AM »
thats funny i'm having the same reaction, i guess i will have to try the rough buff. what grit was your ball before you applied the buff? i was just about to sell it.
--------------------
My stats: High game sanctioned 299, high series 780 http://members.bowl.com/FindAMember/memberView.aspx?mp=1104&ms=6619&s=2005-2006
Arsenal:
Brunswick- FURY, Orignal Inferno(undrilled),Strike Zone, Scorchin Inferno, Smokin Inferno, Power Grove dry'r
Ebonite- Angular One
Hammer- Big Blue spare

TECH SUPPORT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 982
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 02:02:14 PM »
quote:
thats funny i'm having the same reaction, i guess i will have to try the rough buff. what grit was your ball before you applied the buff? i was just about to sell it.
--------------------
My stats: High game sanctioned 299, high series 780 http://members.bowl.com/FindAMember/memberView.aspx?mp=1104&ms=6619&s=2005-2006
Arsenal:
Brunswick- FURY, Orignal Inferno(undrilled),Strike Zone, Scorchin Inferno, Smokin Inferno, Power Grove dry'r
Ebonite- Angular One
Hammer- Big Blue spare



I left it at factory finish wich I believe to be 600, not 100% positive on that though. It really did make a big difference. In my opinion though the mammouth is a better heavy oil ball wich it should be lol.

TECH SUPPORT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 982
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2007, 02:05:51 PM »
quote:
What Tech didn't tell y'all because he's so modest and doesn't brag like one of his men's team members is that was his7th300 this season. He's shot a 300 with every ball compant this season I think.  Maybe I should have bought this ball last week when he was trying to sell it to me for $40. Oh well day late and $40 short...  Nice game tech


lol thanks jimmy. I guess youre referreing to clark's bragging arse. Yes I have shot 7 300's so far but I do realize that they could stop at any moment so i am gracious to have even shot one let alone 28 in my life. See you tonight and let me know if you want me to drill the raw hammer pain for ya.

TECH SUPPORT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 982
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2007, 07:39:38 AM »
Update shot 297 the next night.

TECH SUPPORT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 982
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2007, 03:19:50 PM »
I guess you could call it a choke because it wasnt a good shot at all. I will say that I didnt stick on the fill ball like I did on the previous 11 lol.

bowl400

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2007, 03:28:44 PM »
a friend of mine watched me throw a morich tsa on a heavy oil shot and was pretty impressed.  the tsa however is not as easily available as it once was.  i have heard good comments about the fury.  is it as strong or stronger than the tsa on longer and flatter oil conditions?

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: fury = better than I thought.
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2007, 03:33:21 PM »
Nope less ball than tsa,infinite one, super carbide bomb but very strong still it will get the job done on most longer patterns.


quote:
a friend of mine watched me throw a morich tsa on a heavy oil shot and was pretty impressed.  the tsa however is not as easily available as it once was.  i have heard good comments about the fury.  is it as strong or stronger than the tsa on longer and flatter oil conditions?