BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: hotshot187 on July 12, 2006, 06:03:44 AM

Title: Radical Inferno Vs Original
Post by: hotshot187 on July 12, 2006, 06:03:44 AM
I've been hearing alot of talk that the Radical Inferno is similar to that of the original inferno.  In what ways?  Same core?  

Title: Re: Radical Inferno Vs Original
Post by: shelley on July 12, 2006, 04:02:59 PM
It does have the same core.  Appears to have a polished reactive pearl cover.  Probably the price is about the same.

I don't see a lot more that's comparable.  The RI is supposed to be significantly longer and more angular than the Inferno, which, from everything I've heard about it, has a lot of midlane and a strong, controlled backend.  Angular is not what I've heard about it.

SH
Title: Re: Radical Inferno Vs Original
Post by: Joe Jr on July 12, 2006, 04:06:24 PM
^^^ Sounds right to me.
--------------------
- Joe
Formerly Richard Cranium

www.Brunswickbowling.com
www.Brunswickinsiders.com

House shots are killing this sport.
Title: Re: Radical Inferno Vs Original
Post by: BrunsNick on July 12, 2006, 05:31:05 PM
Cores are identical.
--------------------
Nick Smith ... A.K.A. Les Badderâ„¢
Brunswick -=- PBA 03-06
http://www.BrunsNick.com
¡Viva la nación de Brunswick!
Title: Re: Radical Inferno Vs Original
Post by: a_ak57 on July 12, 2006, 05:34:51 PM
quote:
Not to be mean but I think that the closest we're gonna get to the OI for a while is the AI. The Radical is gonna go longer and turn harder, and from what I saw the cores aren't the same.

At first glance I thought the cores were different too, but then I realized that they are just rotated at different angles in the pics.  If you notice, the extra blocky pieces are still in the same relative position to each other.  Brunswick just rotated the pic is all.
--------------------
- Andy