BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: BowlerKidR on February 27, 2005, 10:50:51 AM

Title: smashR and punisher
Post by: BowlerKidR on February 27, 2005, 10:50:51 AM

I had posted earlier, and said i could get a bruiser or punisher, but it is a smashR and punisher that i could get. What are pro's and cons of each, which is better for length and flip in the back end on med-light oil?

Ryan
--------------------
High Game- 287
3 Game High Series- 808
4 Game High Series- 901
I LIKE TO BOWL

Title: Re: smashR and punisher
Post by: a_ak57 on February 27, 2005, 06:52:01 PM

still the punisher.  Though the smashr is more versatile if you change the cover around, the punisher will go longer still.
--------------------
- Andy

Title: Re: smashR and punisher
Post by: BowlerKidR on February 27, 2005, 06:53:46 PM

thanks, others?

Ryan
--------------------
High Game- 287
3 Game High Series- 808
4 Game High Series- 901
I LIKE TO BOWL

Title: Re: smashR and punisher
Post by: RSalas on February 27, 2005, 07:14:07 PM

Punisher, again.  The SmashR would be earlier and stronger in the midlane, even when polished.
--------------------
Trumpet's Rusty Rat, JH, WC, Can WC...1/3/1992-2/14/2005

Horrid in Doubles, torrid in Singles...
...that's The Curse of Dusty.

Title: Re: smashR and punisher
Post by: LuckyLefty on February 27, 2005, 09:16:06 PM

Smash/r is extremely even for a reactive even when stacked.

It seems to make a smooth slurve all the way down the lane.

No snap at all!

rEgards,

LUckylefty

Title: Re: smashR and punisher
Post by: BowlerKidR on February 28, 2005, 04:38:15 AM

quote:

---

Smash/r is extremely even for a reactive even when stacked.

It seems to make a smooth slurve all the way down the lane.

No snap at all!

rEgards,

LUckylefty

---

hey lucky, u said that the SmashR is extremely even for a reactive even when stacked. What word are u missing from that sentence?

Ryan
--------------------
High Game- 287
3 Game High Series- 808
4 Game High Series- 901
I LIKE TO BOWL