win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Fury vs Strike Zone  (Read 1172 times)

thedjs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Fury vs Strike Zone
« on: October 15, 2007, 09:09:18 AM »

How similar are these two balls on oiler conditions?
Logged

 

  • Guest
Re: Fury vs Strike Zone
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2007, 05:34:34 PM »
If I kept them both the same surface prep., for me the Fury was a little earlier and thus slightly more predictable at the breakpoint.  
The Strike Zone is an all-time favorite, but was slightly more angular at the breakpoint.  Both balls are very versatile, but at this point, the Strike Zone has been discontinued and replaced with the Blast Zone (another good one).


--------------------

Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Logged

BOWL119

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Fury vs Strike Zone
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2007, 08:45:39 PM »
I loved my SZ. It was an outstanding ball and kind regret giving it to my son. But I can not say that the Fury is bad. Once I got the cover where it worked well for me (1000 Abralon), it is an outstanding ball. IT gets down the lane nicely and makes a predictable turn into the pocket.
--------------------
T.J.
BOWLING IS FUN NO MATTER WHAT YOU SCORE. BUT A 300 IS ALWAYS NICE.
Awesome Revs, Finish, Fury, Mammoth (2), Flip, Shift, Total Inferno
GOOD LUCK AND GOOD BOWLING!!!
Opinions are just that, opinions.

This is the LAND OF THE FREE because of THE BRAVE. THANK YOU, OUR MILITARY MEMBERS
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »