win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Super-Flex with Surface  (Read 1181 times)

Garcia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Super-Flex with Surface
« on: January 20, 2005, 04:20:04 AM »
Have any of u Columbia guys had success using surface on any of the Super-Flex balls? Nobody uses surface on these Columbia balls in our region. Yet they do use surface on other company's equipment. Is there a reason? Have any of you had success with surface on Super-Flex coverstock balls?

Thanks

 

Leftyhi-trak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Re: Super-Flex with Surface
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2005, 01:01:26 PM »
We have dropped surface level and then polished back up to a lower grit polish on a few balls like the Detour and Messenger BSP and pearl. Smooth out the backend especially for your axis rotation.

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Super-Flex with Surface
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2005, 03:38:22 PM »
Super-Flex in either pearl or solid version is as easily modifiable as any coverstock on the market and it repsonds to anything you want to do to it. Go for it.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

P1atinumGQ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
Re: Super-Flex with Surface
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2005, 11:36:14 AM »
Mike Wolfe won a PBA title earlier this season with a sanded Detour... I'd consider that success heh.

Krumpy300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 827
Re: Super-Flex with Surface
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2005, 11:48:19 AM »
I dulled my Hyde a bit with a tan pad. Ball is much more predictable for me.
--------------------
Repetition is everything..