win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: pure physics  (Read 3349 times)

jrw

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
pure physics
« on: December 03, 2010, 10:46:48 PM »
would the pure physics outhook the ebonite evolve
Logged

 

icefiction

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
Re: pure physics
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2010, 07:05:25 AM »
yes it will
--------------------


Logged


HAMMERDOWN103

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
Re: pure physics
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2010, 10:05:04 AM »
By a bunch
--------------------
The problem with socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money too...
Logged
HAMMERDOWN!!!

jls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18398
Re: pure physics
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2010, 01:08:22 PM »
quote:
would the pure physics outhook the ebonite evolve



In Heavy Oil, yes...

But the Envolve works well on the drier shots...Polished up, it's a beast...
--------------------
jls
Logged

justdale

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1879
Re: pure physics
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2010, 01:43:57 PM »
Left with OOB condition, the Pure Physics will out hook the Evolve,
not even close
--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
Logged

pbaexp12

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 357
Re: pure physics
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2010, 10:07:07 AM »
I agree that the pure physics will out hook the evolve but only on oily shots.  I have both these balls and the evolve had so much back end I could not use it on my local house shot.  My pure physics however I was able to use with good scores.  The evolve's backend is explosive!!  Give it plenty of room.  The pure had a lot of hooking power biting through the oil but the backend was smoother and controllable.  

Both ball were drill very similar with both having pin up drills.

--------------------
you can email me at gr8_bwler@yahoo.com
My email address has no space the space is the underscore key...
latest 300 shot with arch rival yes!!
columbia is the best!
Logged

HAMMERDOWN103

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
Re: pure physics
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2010, 11:32:42 AM »
I would also argue that shined up the Pure Physics can fly off the backs. Staffer i bowl with has one drilled super early roll for wet dry and another long flippy drill shined up.
--------------------
The problem with socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money too...
Logged
HAMMERDOWN!!!

ChrisLak

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: pure physics
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2010, 05:54:13 PM »
I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer
Logged

justdale

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1879
Re: pure physics
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2010, 11:18:46 PM »
quote:
I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
+1 not even close
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer

--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
Logged

rengawB

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: pure physics
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2010, 10:56:34 AM »
According to bowl.com you only bowl twice a week and are nowhere near a 235 average. You only broke 229 average once. I bet you are not even a staffer!


quote:
I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer
Logged

KoukiGS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: pure physics
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2010, 02:41:29 PM »
Well his profile does say "former"
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »