win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?  (Read 2914 times)

helpless bowler

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« on: April 22, 2008, 05:45:49 AM »
what is the difference between the two? will one make the ball hook more? i have a momentum and a hight flush and wondered which one to use.
Logged

 

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2008, 02:42:09 PM »
Energizer is more of a regular-use cleaner, for use after each set.  Clean and Dull is a deep cleaner, more appropriate for once-a-month serious cleaning.

SH
Logged

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2008, 02:48:25 PM »
quote:
more appropriate for once-a-month serious cleaning.


Why would you limit C&D to once a month? The extra junk C&D picks up beyond Energizer after just one set is significant....
--------------------
"Sometimes, the best move is the one we don't make"
Logged

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2008, 02:57:40 PM »
quote:
quote:
more appropriate for once-a-month serious cleaning.


Why would you limit C&D to once a month? The extra junk C&D picks up beyond Energizer after just one set is significant....


Maybe Energizer can't stand up to Legends' cleaner.    I use Legends' cleaner after each set and I get very little extra out of the ball when I use C&D.

SH
Logged

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2008, 03:34:13 PM »
Makes sense. I've never use the Legends' cleaner, but have heard good things about it. Energizer cleaner on the other hand leaves a lot to be desired...
--------------------
"Sometimes, the best move is the one we don't make"
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2008, 06:21:18 PM »
quote:
what is the difference between the two? will one make the ball hook more? i have a momentum and a hight flush and wondered which one to use.


Besides what shelley said, no cleaner makes a ball hook more. It may clean enough junk off the ball to make it hook more like it was new.

Clean and Dull is not just for dull balls but is best for dull balls because they, in general, absorb oil more quickly than polished balls AND are used on more oil than polished balls, in general.

Legends ball cleaner is, also in my opinion, as well as shelley's, a much better cleaner than Energizer cleaner, a citrus based cleaner. While it won't extract oil, like Clean and Dull is designed to do, it will clean every bit of oil off the surface. (While C&D seems ot extract a slight bit of oil but just barely beneath the surface, it will not replace an essential rejuvenation (oil or plasticizer extraction that is needed every 60 - 100 games for dull balls.)
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Sjf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2008, 10:24:54 PM »
I used Lane Concepts Extreme Clean, and Lane Concepts Extreme Dull.

And while cleaning my bowling balls with these products, I don't have to wear a gas mask to protect me from the smell. And if you use Legends,  you know all about the smell.
Logged

CHawk15

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 764
Re: clean and dull vs energizer cleaner?
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2008, 12:37:58 PM »
charlest pretty much hit it right on the head here.

Clean N Dull is best for dull balls or any bowling ball that absorbs a significant amount of oil and Energizer is more of a clean the dirt and grime off of the surface cleaner.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »