BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: 9inthepit on May 05, 2008, 06:02:45 AM

Title: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: 9inthepit on May 05, 2008, 06:02:45 AM
I have read a ton of reviews on both balls and 99% of them seem to be positive.  Is there a major difference between the 2?  The last Columbia ball I threw was the Reaction Arc, which I loved.  Haven't had much luck finding something to replace it for heavy oil conditions and was considering either the Resurgence or the Cell or possibly a ball with a particle coverstock.  Any thoughts/suggestions?  I typically throw about 17-18 mph with lower revs.  Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: Joeyd on May 05, 2008, 02:06:04 PM
I think, and I'm not positive so please correct me if I'm wrong Columbia/Roto-Grip guys, that the main difference is a symmetrical core (Resurgence) vs. an asymmetrical core (Cell)
--------------------
Joeyd
Shop www.buddiesproshop.com
http://joeyd.bowlspace.com
AIM - JoeydfromNB11
Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: VideoBallReviews on May 05, 2008, 02:21:05 PM
Both hook a ton at their OOB surfaces...for me, the cell gets a little farther downlane before it makes its move, but is more violent at the breakpoint and hooks more overall...the resurgence is a bit more controllable throughout the entire lane and hooks a tad less overall
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")
Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: jkiser01 on May 05, 2008, 03:07:39 PM
that is a perfect explanation of these 2 balls. I agree 100% with this statement and I have thrown them both... alot..

JK

quote:
Both hook a ton at their OOB surfaces...for me, the cell gets a little farther downlane before it makes its move, but is more violent at the breakpoint and hooks more overall...the resurgence is a bit more controllable throughout the entire lane and hooks a tad less overall
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")

--------------------
My first child.. Hannah Allison Kiser born 4/30/2007... My little angel..
Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: charlest on May 05, 2008, 03:20:41 PM
quote:
Both hook a ton at their OOB surfaces...for me, the cell gets a little farther downlane before it makes its move, but is more violent at the breakpoint and hooks more overall...the resurgence is a bit more controllable throughout the entire lane and hooks a tad less overall
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")


I wonder how much of that difference is due to the Resurgence's 800 grit stock finish and the Cell's 2000 grit surface + the drilling of its asymmetric core???

The Cell should be less violent/smoother with an 800 grit surface but then, how much oil would it need to operate at all?

My Cell did not have a violent backend (Britton, I know you said "more violent".), until I went to 4000 grit finish.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")
Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: Jorge300 on May 05, 2008, 03:30:59 PM
I actually have both and both are on OOB condition. I find the Cell handles a little bit more oil. On the Scorpion pattern, the Cell would make it to the pocket, while the Resurgence was leaving 2's, 2-8's, 2-8-10's from the same spot. Also, I think the Cell gives me a little bit more mistake room. Both are very good balls. I use my Resugence as my step down if the Cell start to hook too much or begins leaving a lot of 9 pins.

I have a Rival as well and am thinking of getting another Cell, shining it up to fit between the Resurgence and the Rival, so my most hooking ball down would look like Cell-OOB, Resurgence-OOB, Cell-Shined, Rival-Shined.
--------------------
Jorge300

Title: Re: Resurgence vs Cell
Post by: VideoBallReviews on May 05, 2008, 03:43:24 PM
quote:
I wonder how much of that difference is due to the Resurgence's 800 grit stock finish and the Cell's 2000 grit surface + the drilling of its asymmetric core???

The Cell should be less violent/smoother with an 800 grit surface but then, how much oil would it need to operate at all?

My Cell did not have a violent backend (Britton, I know you said "more violent".), until I went to 4000 grit finish.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")


Charlest,

Just so you know the Resurgence is actually 1000 Abralon OOB so they are actually pretty close...i still would imagine that cover preps do make a slight difference..i think the biggest difference tho here is core strength...in reality i would be willing to bet if you put the same core under both covers you wouldnt see ALOT of difference....

Then it comes down to the brand differences, most storm/roto pieces are cleaner than most (note: im saying MOST here people!) ebonite made covers...
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE (http://"http://www.viseinserts.com")
3G Shoes (http://"http://www.900global.com")
Buddiesproshop.com (http://"http://www.buddiesproshop.com")