BallReviews

General Category => Coverstock Preparation => Topic started by: lee teano on September 03, 2014, 11:10:56 PM

Title: brunswick royal compound and rough buff
Post by: lee teano on September 03, 2014, 11:10:56 PM

can some one tell me what is the diff. brunswick royal compound and rough bull.

thank
lee

Title: Re: brunswick royal compound and rough buff
Post by: BallReviews-Removed0385 on September 04, 2014, 04:21:04 AM

The Royal Compound is a little "creamier", and so I don't experience the powder - like residue that I sometimes saw with Rough Buff. For those who have spinners without water supply,  the Royal Compound should be easier to use.  End result should be pretty close with either one in my estimation.

Title: Re: brunswick royal compound and rough buff
Post by: charlest on September 04, 2014, 06:45:32 AM

Although the Brunswick rep, who replied to my query when Royal Compound first came out,said there was a slight difference between the two, for practical matters, I saw virtually zero difference between them when I applied them to a ball.

Title: Re: brunswick royal compound and rough buff
Post by: Aloarjr810 on September 04, 2014, 05:42:40 PM

Quote from: charlest on September 04, 2014, 06:45:32 AM

for practical matters, I saw virtually zero difference between them when I applied them to a ball.

I agree, Rough Buff I think had a slight gritter feel to it than royal (But that might be different batch to batch).

But in use I saw no practical difference between the two.