BallReviews
General Category => Coverstock Preparation => Topic started by: Boss_Hog on January 29, 2013, 08:34:22 AM
-
What, if any differences are there between the two?
-
FWIW, I've found both to be excellent polishes.
Brunswick appears to have slightly more abrasives in it. Brunswick used to apply it over 400 grit (US/CAMI grade) and got a very high gloss finish.
Personally, in most cases, I'd rather use the less abrasive polish so that I get where I want in gradual increments more easily. You can do the same with the more abrasive polish; you just need to exercise more caution.
-
Thanks.
Powerhouse tends to give me a more slick, polish feel to it.
Brunswick always seemed to leave a bit more of a tacky feel.
Is that due to the abrasives?
-
Thanks.
Powerhouse tends to give me a more slick, polish feel to it.
Brunswick always seemed to leave a bit more of a tacky feel.
Is that due to the abrasives?
Not that I am aware.
I get that tacky feeling from all polishes and after fine sandings also.
-
FWIW, I've found both to be excellent polishes.
Brunswick appears to have slightly more abrasives in it. Brunswick used to apply it over 400 grit (US/CAMI grade) and got a very high gloss finish.
Personally, in most cases, I'd rather use the less abrasive polish so that I get where I want in gradual increments more easily. You can do the same with the more abrasive polish; you just need to exercise more caution.
Charlest, Curious as to what you mean by "I get where I want in gradual increments more easily"
or can you explain your though process behind this,
and what conditions do you consider this for?