BallReviews

General Category => Drilling & Layouts => Topic started by: lefty50 on May 04, 2019, 11:05:38 AM

Title: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
Post by: lefty50 on May 04, 2019, 11:05:38 AM
Looking for feedback on the theory that having more weight in the bottom of the core like the Hammer Statement has a positive impact on continuation... Feedback?
Thanks in advance
Title: Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
Post by: BowlingForDonuts on May 04, 2019, 12:34:01 PM
Creed core also is bottom heavy.  I think it does help with an asym but probably not that much.  I don't quite see the continuation with my Creed I see with my Scandal Pearl for example.
Title: Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
Post by: bowler100 on May 04, 2019, 08:28:36 PM
Looking for feedback on the theory that having more weight in the bottom of the core like the Hammer Statement has a positive impact on continuation... Feedback?
Thanks in advance
Honestly, I don't know the science behind this but I have found balls with cores that have more mass at the bottom have a smoother and more continuous reaction. Balls like the Morich Colossus Supreme and the Storm La Nina/El Nino have a very elongated hook phase in my experience while the Track Silencer (being pretty top heavy) has a very defined hook/set reaction.
Title: Re: Feedback on core with more mass in the bottom
Post by: six pack on May 04, 2019, 10:12:30 PM
I found this to be true to a point. you have to also consider int.diff in the equation. My 0.11 int.diff rebellion despite cover prep goes much longer then my compound buff hit man enforcer with a int.diff of 0.20. I've found top heavy cores to flip while bottom heavy are long and continues.