BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Dyno-Thane => Topic started by: high_revs on April 20, 2005, 05:47:44 AM

Title: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: high_revs on April 20, 2005, 05:47:44 AM: I'm currently bowl with brunswick equipment, original inferno & absolute inferno. Currently looking for a performance ball for lighter patterns, need length & arc. Which ball(s) would fit in my arsenal? Suggestions? Tip? How do brunswick balls compare to dynothane balls?

thanks
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: lion95 on April 20, 2005, 02:56:02 PM: I have thrown both Brunswick and Dyno-Thane as far as hitting the pocket I think any ball that is thrown correctly into the 1-3 pocket or 1-2 pocket will hit hard, but most of the Brunswick balls roll earlier than the Dyno-thane balls and for me personally left alot of ten pins. I have a tendency to come behind the head behind alot, but for some reason my Dyno-thane balls seems to carry the 10 pin alot better than Brunswick. If u are looking for length and arc on light oil I would suggest to try the Vendetta Pearl or the Crisis Pearl
--------------------
"How do I roll a strike?"
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: TheBowlingKid25 on April 20, 2005, 03:03:36 PM: quote:
I have thrown both Brunswick and Dyno-Thane as far as hitting the pocket I think any ball that is thrown correctly into the 1-3 pocket or 1-2 pocket will hit hard, but most of the Brunswick balls roll earlier than the Dyno-thane balls and for me personally left alot of ten pins. I have a tendency to come behind the head behind alot, but for some reason my Dyno-thane balls seems to carry the 10 pin alot better than Brunswick. If u are looking for length and arc on light oil I would suggest to try the Vendetta Pearl or the Crisis Pearl
--------------------
"How do I roll a strike?"
well like you said, any ball thrown 'correctly' will carry. If you want a true light oil ball, the new power groove dry/r will be your ticket. The original power grooves, in my opinion, are WAY stronger then advertised, and NOT alight oil ball. Especially for you, considering your screen name. Now, as for dyno-thane, I dont know much about them. OH, and if you can get your hands on a Brunswick Monster Slay/R, that would be great also. Very controlled.
--------------------
....BRUNSWICK!
Â¡Viva la naciÃ³n de Brunswick!
Nothing more to be said.
....DEATH BY CHEETOS!!!!
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: jimensminger on April 20, 2005, 03:04:26 PM: what the Lion said,...I was with B'wick before DynoThane,..B'wick balls seem more condition specific, and had to be changed quicker as the lanes change,..I can stay with a D/T longer as the lanes transition,...also the shells seem to keep their prepared surface longer on the D/Ts,...B'wick seemed to track up quicker...Both are great balls,and what works for some don't work for others,..
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: xxZonexx on April 20, 2005, 05:06:34 PM: Thing returns Imo, pin above ring Cg in palm
--------------------
LIVE OR DIE
ITS YOUR CHOICE
*THE THING LIVES*
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: lion95 on April 21, 2005, 10:47:48 AM: Dyno-Thane and Storm are none for being clean thru the heads, where as most of the brunswick balls starts rolling real early in the heads, not saying that is a bad thing, it just was not conducive to my style. What I really look in a ball is the overall performance, not just what the ball does on the backends, Dyno-Thane balls are great in the midlanes, making it easier for me to read the Break point. I am a Dyno-Thane man for life, so go out and get the Vendetta Pearl or the Crisis Pearl, I hope this helps.
--------------------
"How do I roll a strike?"

Edited on 4/21/2005 10:41 AM

Edited on 4/21/2005 10:42 AM
Title: Re: Dynothane vs. Brunswick
Post by: high_revs on April 21, 2005, 03:54:07 PM: thanks for the suggestions