win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Ring or plaque  (Read 2835 times)

xxZonexx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
Ring or plaque
« on: February 14, 2005, 12:36:14 PM »
for my 298 with my thing lives ?

 

xxZonexx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
Re: Ring or plaque
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2005, 01:47:28 PM »
i left 7-10 too...

sundevil300

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 39
Re: Ring or plaque
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2005, 06:59:39 AM »
i think the plaque is better, it can go on the wall for everyone to see, the rings are okay, but i would go with plaques, i have already lost one of my 300 rings. but i still got plaques from when i was a little boy.  ultimately its your decision.
when i shoot any more honor scores it will be plaques from now on.  keep up the good shooting,
--------------------
HAMMER SUCKS...IT REALLY REALLY SUCKS


those who use hammer equiptment , set themselves up for criticism.....G E E K S!!

wannabeabowler

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Re: Ring or plaque
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2005, 07:38:43 AM »
just out of curiosity, is the first ring for a 299 in siladium free?  i am filling out the paperwork today and was just wondering.

Goof1073

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2433
Re: Ring or plaque
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2005, 08:43:32 AM »
Yes, you can get a free saladium ring for the first of each honor score bowled during a single season.  So if you where to shot another 299 this year you would only get a cheap little certificate from ABC and the option to buy a ring at your expense.

Thing I've thought was "odd" about the logic is say a person shoots the more typical cycle for the year: 298.299.300.800 they get four rings.  But a person that shoots 4 - 300's in a year only gets one?  I know the current method saves them some money in the long run, but I still thought it was "odd" for some reason.
--------------------
-Chris: DJ's Pro Shop : Auburn, MA