win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce  (Read 4246 times)

wolfcastle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« on: October 12, 2003, 05:32:44 PM »
hallo,

i´m a bowler from germany so please excuse my bad english.

i use columbia´s jekyll and hyde and i love it.
i tried a storm x-factor deuce and the ball did nothing. we have a 42 feet oil pattern and it won´t hook. my hyde hooks much more.
the reason why i drilled my x-factor is that i wanted to have a ball for heavier and longer oiled pattern. every time i used no columbia balls it was a mistake, but i would like to give an other lable a chance.

could the v2 strong be a good choice?

my avarage is round about 195.
14 lbs. balls
fingers behind the ball at 5 o´clock to have good rotation
high track on the ball, medium speed.
 

 

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2003, 09:53:56 AM »
Wolfcastle,

The X-Factor Deuce will probably skid too long for you if the pattern is heavy and long. The V2 Strong will roll and grab earlier. Better in those conditions.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

wolfcastle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2003, 07:21:52 AM »
hi,

i bought the v2 und drilled it

......................pin...
...............mf...rf......
.............................
............................
.................cg.........
...........................
...........................
................th.......

it has a gigantic trackflare but not the extrem hook i hoped it would have.
the hit into the pins is great.

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2003, 09:18:39 AM »
Wolfcastle,

How do you think the V2 Strong compares to your other bowling balls? Hopefully you get more choices choosing a line to the pocket with a strong particle in your bag.

I am not sure exactly what you had hoped for hook-wise. Did you hope for more hook when the ball hits the dry in the backend or more of a strong arc starting in the midlane?

--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2003, 09:26:11 AM »
Wolfcastle,

The drilling you chose makes for a bit more length and a bit less hook than a more leverages drilling. A more leveraged drilling would be something like this.


...............mf...rf......
.................. pin......
............................
............................
..........................cg
............................
................th..........


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

wolfcastle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2003, 12:03:25 PM »
hi jensm,

i hope i understood your question right.

if the hyde won´t hook on longer and heavyer pattern the v2 shall do the job.
i bowl through the middle of the lane for example from board 20 to 10 and the ball hooks back into the pocket.

the hyde makes a strong continues curve at the breakpoint.
it is drilled:

...................pin.....
........................
.........mf...rf.....
.....................
..............cg.....
.....................
.....................
..........th.........

it´s a great ball

my jekyll goes longer and makes a sharp hook at the breakpoint.
the jekyll is drilled:


...............pin....
..........mf...rf.....
......................
..............cg.....
.....................
....................
...........th......
.....................


do you have an idea how i could drill the v2 better, for a stronger hook?

thanks for your help.

Edited on 10/15/2003 12:20 PM

wolfcastle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2003, 12:05:10 PM »
i´ve forgotten. at the moment the hyde has a larger hook, it makes more boards than the v2 on a 42 feet pattern.
the pin of the v2 is a bit more on the right side than i draw it.
the v2 is drilled

......................pin....
..........mf..rf...........
.............................
.............cg.......
......................
...........th........








Edited on 10/15/2003 12:16 PM

Edited on 10/15/2003 12:17 PM

Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2003, 12:19:31 PM »
If you want to stay with Columbia, try the Throttle.  If you want to try a Storm Product, go with the new Fear Factor.  Both balls will work very well in a longer oil patern.  The V2 strong is a good ball but I feel the others will work much better in longer oil especially in the middle of the lane.

Good Luck

Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2003, 12:20:02 PM »
If you want to stay with Columbia, try the Throttle.  If you want to try a Storm Product, go with the new Fear Factor.  Both balls will work very well in a longer oil patern.  The V2 strong is a good ball but I feel the others will work much better in longer oil especially in the middle of the lane.

Good Luck

Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2003, 12:20:04 PM »
If you want to stay with Columbia, try the Throttle.  If you want to try a Storm Product, go with the new Fear Factor.  Both balls will work very well in a longer oil patern.  The V2 strong is a good ball but I feel the others will work much better in longer oil especially in the middle of the lane.

Good Luck

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2003, 03:58:19 PM »
Wolfcastle,

The low RG of the Hyde makes it a very early revving ball. This is good on oilier lanes. You can get the V2 Strong to start turning earlier in the lane and get a stronger finish with a more leveraged drilling (see below). If you don't want to plug and redrill the ball you can get it to start turning earlier by adding a balance hole 3 3/8 inches below your PAP

......mf...rf......
......... pin......
.............................PAP
..................cg
...................
.............................bh
........th........

Of course you can find stronger balls than the V2 Strong in the marketplace. However, the V2 Strong is a really strong ball as well.

--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

wolfcastle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2003, 06:23:55 AM »
hi jensm,

i´ve drilled an extra-hole and the ball starts earlier to roll.

thanks for that tip.

........................pin...
...............mf..rf..........
.............................
..................cg.....PAP....
.............................
............................
................th..........
......................X......


Edited on 10/18/2003 6:33 AM

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2003, 12:59:39 PM »
Wolfcastle,

Glad to hear it worked out for you. Good luck in the future!


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

DonSVO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
Re: v2 strong vs. x-factor deuce
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2003, 12:56:52 AM »
i have been using my V2 strong for about 2 weeks now. at first, i was dismayed with the 'hit' in the pocket. mine tends to "shove" the pins into the pit. i use a Messenger Ti Pearl on the mediums, and man that ball blows pins EVERYWHERE. the change to the V2 was quite noticable. BUT!, on my heavy-oil tuesday night league, the V2 stomps the messenger into the gutter. i am averaging 179 with that V2 ball right now. on the same lanes with the messenger... i was averaging 136. now that i have learned its characteristics and flaws (stone 7 pins, at least 2 a game), it works great.

i am a lefty tweener with medium ball speed. i use all 14 lb. equipment.

.......pin...
........RF...MF
..............
.......CG.....
...............
............
..............TH

Edited on 10/22/2003 1:07 AM