win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Original urethane NAIL vs BLACK HAMMER  (Read 2857 times)

Juggernaut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • Former good bowler, now 3 games a week house hack.
Original urethane NAIL vs BLACK HAMMER
« on: February 11, 2009, 01:32:31 PM »
WHat was the difference between these two?  Was there a difference in the shell hardness, or was it just the surface finish that was different?

  I know the PINK HAMMER was a very hard urethane, but I was thinking the original NAIL was softer ( like the black HAMMER ), just with a polished finish.
--------------------
Norm Duke was right

Good transactions list in my profile

My Bowl.com member page

Learn to laugh, and love, and smile, cause we’re only here for a little while.

 

KingofKings696

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
Re: Original urethane NAIL vs BLACK HAMMER
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2009, 04:31:13 PM »
The nail is awesome if you have a chance to get one dont hesitate.

Doug Sterner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4395
Re: Original urethane NAIL vs BLACK HAMMER
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2009, 12:33:28 PM »
If what my buddy in college at the time told me is true, the Nail and Pink Hammer were the same ball. Apparently the Nail had a problem originally where one ball cracked before the TV finals or soemthing and sales of the ball after that were horrendous. As a result they ditched the Nail name, recolored the coverstock and called it the Pink Hammer.

I may not be 100% accurate but that's what my buddy told me. His dad was a pro shop owner at the time (early 90's) and a regional PBA bowler so I tend to believe him.
--------------------
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

http://dougsproshop@aol.com
www.dougsproshop.net
Lane 1 Buzzsaw...The Official Power Tool Of Bowling
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

Proud Member of the NRA
Fighting to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.