win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: BW vs. Toxic  (Read 1017 times)

CARDSFANAM

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
BW vs. Toxic
« on: April 02, 2007, 02:54:21 AM »
Need some info on how these balls react compared to each other drilled the same, and thrown on the same oil.
--------------------
Goodnight doctor, that feels good!

 

Fatboy8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3265
Re: BW vs. Toxic
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2007, 04:15:43 PM »
Here's mine so far:

Black Widow #1~ pin right of ring, and up slightly, cg stacked, weight hole. This ball goes long, and has fierce backend. I've used this on a bunch of different conditions, and it always impresses me.

Black Widow #2~ pin over bridge, cg kicked right, weight hole. This thing really wants to rev up early, and has a TON of backend on it. Just like #1, it drives hard, and continuous.

Toxic~ pin under ring, cg kicked about 45*, weight hole. This ball is a beast to say the least. It wants to hook at the arrows, has a ton of midlane, and still saves some for the backend and really drives all the way through. It's probably the strongest out of the 2 Widow's and No Mercy on overall hook, and oil handling.

No Mercy~ drilled with the standard "bag" drilling. Good ball, was kinda of unpredictable at times, and it's "oil" handling was some what overrated. It's a good ball, but the Widow and Toxic are number one picks in my book.

For me, the two different layouts on the Widows, and my Toxic really gives me a good variety. I'd like to try another Toxic with a weaker layout sometime, and unlock even more potential in that ball.


--------------------
Hammer-Lane #1-Ebonite-Brunswick