win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?  (Read 1735 times)

JamesCube

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« on: February 21, 2005, 05:45:05 AM »
He used two differently drilled Big Blue Pearls and was getting weak hits all day.  Just thinking maybe with the Big Deal with a similar but more aggressive  core and more aggressive cover he might be the US Open champ.
--------------------
Last Ball: Sling Blade
Current Ball: The Deal

 

JPRLane1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3318
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2005, 01:48:44 PM »
He likes the big blue pearl it is one of his favorites and he throws it a lot.  Weak hits nope only on shots he left light(not the balls fault) like for the most part he was blistering the rack high and leaving six pins he did this 3 or 4 times and it def. wasn't hitting weak on these shots.  It was a very touchy shot he didn't want to get on it too much and leave nasty splits better to come in a little light and try and leave good count.  I doubt he would have been comfortable with a brand new ball guys tend to throw their "comfort balls" on those type of patterns.
--------------------
I should just quit bowling, oh wait I already tried that.
Now that I am back and my Saws are sharp again, I am ready to cut some wood.
Leader & Founder of Fellowship of the Saws! 03/04/05 Respect us or get left in our Saw Dust!
Level 2 Certified Coach!

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2005, 01:59:40 PM »
I agree that the BBP was just hooking too much: light was fine but unreliable. He had tons of trouble getting a solid pocket hit(except for the 10th frame) because, as I saw it, the BBP ws just hooking too much. He might have needed to move slightly further inside or change to the BB solid, for an earlier read, and less overall hook.

This 41 ft pattern was flat but by no means oily. Medium-strong control balls were the order of the day all week long, while keeping the ball inside the 10 board all the way down, on both sides of the lane. The less hand you had the less deep you had to play, as long as you could get it thru the heads.

I think the only reason Barnes succeeded with a ball as theoretically weak as the Throttle-Up, a polished, medium oil, low-load particle, was he was using so much roll with his release. That's the way it looked to me, anyway.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

All10

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2005, 05:32:57 PM »
quote:
I think the only reason Barnes succeeded with a ball as theoretically weak as the Throttle-Up,



Actually, straight from Dave Smart at Columbia, Barnes was using an Icon300.  He was going back and forth in practice with that ball and a Drive.  Felt like he had a better reaction with the Icon300.  I guess he was right.

anotherwindup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 740
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2005, 05:50:31 AM »
I believe he was using the BBP to control the breakpoint.   If he had used a Big Deal the ball would have went sideways out of the pattern.   That is not what you want on difficult conditions.  

PA Flat out bowled Barnes.   Barnes got good breaks on about 5 shots that were very high, or even brooklyn.  

Nice Bowling, PA.
--------------------

Jason Jenkins
Hammer Pride Staff Member
"Nothing HITS like a Hammer"

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2005, 07:04:11 AM »
quote:
.  

PA Flat out bowled Barnes.   Barnes got good breaks on about 5 shots that were very high, or even brooklyn.  

Nice Bowling, PA.
--------------------

Jason Jenkins
Hammer Pride Staff Member
"Nothing HITS like a Hammer"


I think most of us saw it the other way around. WHile Barnes threw 2 crossovers and left the 3/6/10, PA either missed light, carrying a few of those or went threw the nose and either carried or left a 6 or a 6/10.  Barnes flushed 5 or 7 of them. No slam on either of them, as all 4 executed very well to get there at all.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

anotherwindup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 740
Re: Why wasn't PA throwing the Big Deal at the US Open?
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2005, 09:53:57 AM »
hmm.   I will have to go watch it again on TiVo, as I still believe that PA out bowled Barnes.  

I will take another look.  


--------------------

Jason Jenkins
Hammer Pride Staff Member
"Nothing HITS like a Hammer"