win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Black vs Burgundy Pure Hammer  (Read 1184 times)

wpzone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Black vs Burgundy Pure Hammer
« on: May 20, 2009, 12:29:18 PM »
What is the difference?  I have seen several Black Pures on here for sale recently, but do not see them in Hammers Classic section.  I have the Burgundy and was just curious what the difference was.

 

wpzone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Re: Black vs Burgundy Pure Hammer
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2009, 10:24:05 AM »
anybody?

Gene J Kanak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3005
Re: Black vs Burgundy Pure Hammer
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2009, 10:31:17 AM »
I had both, but I didn't really throw either of them all that much. To me, the Black grabbed the lane much, much earlier than the Burgundy. The burgundy actually got some length and offered mild to slightly-strong arc on the backend from straighter angles or when the lanes began to fry up. For me, the black grabbed the lane instantly and just wanted to keep hooking. So, in my hands, it was too strong for actual dry, but it wasn't strong enough for any true oil. Needless to say, I didn't keep mine for very long. Then again, I didn't do anything in the way of surface adjustments or drilling changes, so others may have seen drastically different results.
--------------------
Bowling bad since 1979 with no end in sight

http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=519&suffix=9130



dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7605
Re: Black vs Burgundy Pure Hammer
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2009, 03:11:31 AM »
I still have a black one and love it (check my extensive review). Coverstock is stronger than expected - it is a good light condition ball, but NOT for dry lanes. I can still hear local users cursing their black PHs for the great hhk they got out of it...
The black one has a urethane/resin blend coverstock that's pretty smooth, but offers very good traction once it hits the dry. I had mine polished in the beginning (plus the pin at 5.5" from PAP high above the fingers, CG stacked), and it made the ball hook like a monster. Not that it was hard to control, but it hooked simply too much, too early! Later I took it to 4.000 Abralon (not much change) and finally 1.500 grit wet sanded, and this made the ball much tamer and more versatile without sacrificing length - I frequently use it in league and tournaments in late games on medium to light conditions. An underrated piece!

I heard controversial things about the later burgundy PH - a pure reactive ball. What I heard was that it was more aggressive than the black one, but that contradicts Gene's observations and I do not have 1st hand experience with it.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany