win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Taboo or 250k?  (Read 1695 times)

gokenong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Taboo or 250k?
« on: May 09, 2011, 09:49:59 AM »
Hi hammerheads, anyone of you guys own these two balls? Which ball would be more suitable for oily lanes? How do these 2 balls compare side by side?  Looking to try my first Hammer ball.  Thanks!


 

gokenong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Taboo or 250k?
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2011, 05:19:58 PM »
anyone please?


dw23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Taboo or 250k?
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2011, 10:38:36 PM »
I don't know about the Taboo but the 250K (Domination) works just fine for me on heavier/longer volumes. I would have confidence in the ball on any heavier/longer condition as long as you change the cover to suit the condition.


DW
 
Edited by dw23 on 5/10/2011 at 10:42 PM
Deven Walls

Pro Shop Staff Member
Lord Field/Lane Masters
www.lordfield.com and www.lane-masters.com
"Changing Bowling, One Bowler At A Time"

HammerTech

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Taboo or 250k?
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2011, 12:45:47 PM »
The Taboo is going to be more mid lane compared to the 250k. So if you are looking for something that picks up a little harder in the mid lane the Taboo would be the way to go. Hope this helps


gokenong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Taboo or 250k?
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2011, 05:52:07 PM »
ok, thanks guys for the replies.