win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Unsure about the Vibes  (Read 4222 times)

Redline

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Unsure about the Vibes
« on: July 17, 2007, 07:31:30 AM »
After working with my Toxic and BWP a bit more on fresh conditions, it has become apparent that I definitely need a "drier" lane ball.

Problem being is that I can't decide between the Blue or Cherry Vibe.  

Playing down and in, I want the length that the Cherry offers, but am afraid of it being too strong/angular/uncontrollable off the dry.

From what I have read, the Blue vibe is smoother but doesn't provide as much length or a strong reaction off the dry.

I am thinking of getting the Blue Vibe but drilling it with the pin up to try and create extra length and a strong but controllable turn off the dry.


 

Redline

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Re: Unsure about the Vibes
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2007, 01:31:55 AM »
Absolutebowling-Thanks again for the information.

Regarding your choice of layout, while it is true I want a strong move off the breakpoint, it is getting to that point that becomes a problem.  As the lanes dry up, the balls check up and move earlier.  What I am looking for my later shift balls to do, is to "push" a little farther down lanes.  The Toxic does this after my BWP starts becoming a little uncontrollable, the Vibe should do the same for the Toxic.  In a nutshell, I am looking for the push to the breakpoint, then still have enough energy to come off and carry.

I have tried the various "Rico'ed" layouts, the ball rolled smoothly, but still started checking up.  Plus I didn't like the "reaction shape" it created on the lanes.  So I am still more confident with my current choice for layouts.  Though I still need to get some additional input from my driller/coach.

As far as moving in and using the dry.  I haven't been able to.  I've been studying pros and looking for ways to move in and swing the ball out.  Even talked with my coach and other bowlers who work at the center.  To my basic understanding is that they lay down a few units along the gutters downlane to eliminate a wall and/or don't strip the edges of the lane-maybe that's why the house I bowl at is considered one of the "tougher" houses in the area.  With the middle flooded, and carrydown an issue, and no real wall to bounce off of, unless you have a slow ball speed, you can't play anywhere inside of 15.  Believe me I have tried in practice.  Only to have most of the staff and other bowlers tell me that what I am doing won't work.  

I was stubborn for a bit and kept at it, but I ended forcing the shot which lead to more bad habits, and my average dropped considerably.  From watching others, I've seen two people play inside of the 15 board, both had tons of grab at the bottom of their swing and ball speeds around 9-12.  At other houses, what you mentioned holds true, and I can make such a move, if the lanes allow it.

That all being said, in rare cases, there is an option of moving to around 15 and swinging it out, if the lanes dry out enough and there are people playing around the gutter.  With the current layouts/balls I use, they are versatile enough that they will still have enough energy to come back, in the times that I have been forced to make such a move.

Nevertheless, I still prefer to try and use the ball covers to compensate for changing lane conditions.  Because all of those times I have had to make a move, I found myself wishing for a weaker ball and trying to get it to push a little downlane.  I haven't invested in one for whatever reason-maybe I'm getting a little smarter with age.  *shrug*

Charlest-It is difficult to put into words my desired ball reaction shape.  In simple terms, I want the best of both Vibes.  Long ball reaction, that snaps back to the pocket in a smooth controlled way.  Either way, with the Ebonite equipment that I have currently layed out-I get the length and the snap.

Now that I have switched to Hammer, the ball reaction shape that the BWP and Toxic have-they fit what I am looking for.  I am hoping the CV does the same.

I contemplated the BV...but everyone says it "arcs".  That got me thinking, I change the backend reaction, but I doubt I can make a ball that arcs do something else.  Thus I went with the CV, and if need be, I will make those cover adjustments.

In the end, its just all words.  



Edited on 7/18/2007 1:33 AM

Edited on 7/18/2007 1:38 AM

Djarum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
Re: Unsure about the Vibes
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2007, 04:40:54 PM »
quote:
Ok, enough of the crap that has already been posted. Moving the pin has nothing to do with static weights, regardless of your side of the debate on the subject.

Pin height controls the height of the core. A taller core is a higher RG core, and a shorter core is a lower rg core. The same theory as an Ice skater spinning.....

An easy way to visualise the effect on pin height is to use a drink bottle. The cap on the bottle is the pin.

Place the pin (the cap of the bottle) UP, and rotate the bottle sideways. Notice how long it takes for the bottle to completely complete a revolution. Notice how tall the bottle looks in profile. This is using the cores highest RG value

Place the pin in the palm and rotate it sideways. It now has to travel less distance around its axis before completing an entire revolution. The bottle appears shorter and more compact in view. This is using the cores lowest RG value.

On edit, I'll also answer the original question that the poster placed.

Placing the pin in a weak position in relation to your pap is almost the worst thing you can do in this situation. This will not get the ball flaring enough to get off its original flare line, due to the nature of the lower differential of the core. A good way to get length and control is to keep the pin up, but give the pin to pap aspect of the layout more "theoretical" strength.

Without seeing you bowl, and seeing your other preffered layouts its hard to dictate a good pin to pap distance, however a generally safe suggestion in this instance is a 4 by layout, keeping the pin at least 3 inches above the midline. please place the CG so you don't require the use of a balance hole, but you can place one in if you wish. Generally between 3/4 and 1 inch from grip centre is safe, unless your topweight is greater than 3.5oz. If in doubt, check before you drill the ball on a dodo scale.

You can then use the appropriate sized, pitched and distanced balance hole to fine tune the reaction after throwing the ball and seeing what it does.

If after all this, you are still getting snap, hit the ball with a little abralon surface (4000, 2000, 1000 etc etc) until you get the ball responding to friction as you want it to.

Hope this helps.


--------------------
www.absolutebowling.com  troll free zone


Edited on 7/17/2007 10:07 PM


I completly agree with this. I had a jolt pearl drilled up, and has little flare. The ball does exactly what Tonx is talking about, flaring over the original line. This is great for fried heads, but I never see fried heads, what I see is monster backend, and this thing just jumps hard off the dry. You almost want to drill this ball stronger than intended to get the ball to burn a little, making it more controlable.

Dj
--------------------
The views and opinions of Djarum expressed on BallReviews.com do not necessarily state or reflect those of the BallReviews.com.

chitown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5876
Re: Unsure about the Vibes
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2007, 11:48:50 PM »
GiVing layout advice is sometimes hard because i've never seen you bowl.  However based on the reply's i'm going to make a suggestion.

I have seen both the Cherry and Blue Vibe in action.  The Blue vibe is smoother off the spot but still has plenty of power.  I really don't see THAT much of a difference between the two.  I feel that either one will work for you.

Layouts:  I'm from the camp that feels a bowler can set up a great arsenal with 1 layout.  Just let the cover and cores separate the reactions between the balls.  This is a simple approach that has worked well for me in the past.  

I currently use 2 different layouts in my arsenal.  So out of 4 strike balls, 3 will have the same layout.

For you I would just go with your initial layout.  Place the pin 5 1/2 from your pap and call it a day.  If the ball is too jumpy for you then change the cover a tad bit.  

Now with respect to pin height.  I am a high track bowler and only use pins above the fingers, type layouts.  You can have controllable reactions with high pin layouts.  


--------------------
This fall it's Raw Hammer Time!

Edited on 7/19/2007 7:56 AM

Edited on 7/19/2007 7:58 AM

Redline

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Re: Unsure about the Vibes
« Reply #19 on: July 19, 2007, 01:24:58 AM »
Luckylefty-

First and foremost, you dispelled a major concern being that the two vibes are different.  Arc and Skid/Flip are worlds apart in terms of ball reactions in my mind.  So your comment that there isn't much difference helps reassure me that I made a good choice.

I have been migrating towards your mindset of setting similar/same layouts and letting the cover/core do the work.  As it stands now, I have a standard "benchmark" layout that I like, and the aforementioned layout with the pin over the bridge for a little more push/length.  

As you and several others have stated...I can make cover adjustments as needed.  In addition, I am going to run the same layout as the Toxic to take a little more guesswork out of the ball reaction.  I have been going through a good number of balls (more than I'd like to-but I can't help it), so I want to be sure this is done right.

I will find out on Friday and post up my results.