Author Topic: Dynamo question (Read 8318 times)

Storm269 · « **on:** March 18, 2009, 01:13:18 PM »

Bowlers with not much hand do you have problem using the Dynamo on the outside line ?
--------------------
In my bag :

Virtual Gravity

Hy-Road

Buzzsaw Clear Diamond

Steven · « **Reply #16 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:23:59 PM »

jls: Do you make it a habit of cherry picking comments that fit your agenda? Others have said it does hook a lot. You don't seem to take the more positive input as much to heart.

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #17 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:29:12 PM »

quote:
jls: Do you make it a habit of cherry picking comments that fit your agenda? Others have said it does hook a lot. You don't seem to take the more positive input as much to heart.

+1 and yes he does
wouldn't be jls if he wasn't making his sucker punch jabs
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

jls · « **Reply #18 on:** March 25, 2009, 01:45:08 PM »

quote:
jls: Do you make it a habit of cherry picking comments that fit your agenda? Others have said it does hook a lot. You don't seem to take the more positive input as much to heart.

Steven, may I call you Steven. You don't have time for me, for I see you have your hands full with CRD.

Now move on.

B-dawg, hey hows it going?

Actually I have missed you guys, ok that's a lie. But I have noticed that the Dynamo seems to have fallen off the charts lately. The ball of the year has sure been quiet on this site latley.

So I thought I would perk things up a bit, and wake up the sawheads!!!

I see it worked.

Too bad that there has been so little interest in the Dynamo lately.

But now that I have woke up some sawheads, things may start to pick up.

No need to thank me.

My work here is done

--------------------
jls

Steven · « **Reply #19 on:** March 25, 2009, 02:01:11 PM »

quote:
Steven, may I call you Steven. You don't have time for me, for I see you have your hands full with CRD.

Now move on.

jls: We've already established that you can call me Steven. I appreciate the courtesy of you asking, but the permission is a done deal. We can certainly 'move on' from that.

CRD? LOL. The man is certified to be at least one can short of a six pack. Maybe you can help him figure out how much reaction is from cover, and what the remaining might be. He's really struggled with that concept. Regardless, I'm currently not elbows deep in a CRD created cesspool.

If you're just bored and trying to generate some buzz, then cool. Now you can move on.....

Steven · « **Reply #20 on:** March 31, 2009, 10:43:06 AM »

quote:
Yeah, little stevie, to your closed little mind that might be true.

CRD: The truth is the truth. It doesn't matter if you feel the messenger is arrogant or closed minded. And the truth is that you are certified to be at least one can short of a six pack. Your repeated emotional break downs, lack of focus, and inability to comprehend some of the more basic technicalities of bowling are proof beyond a reasonable doubt. You should be appreciative to get this kind of constructive feedback. Clearly your so called friends apparently aren't being honest with you.

quote:
Why don't you keep your focus on this post.

There is that lack of focus I just mentioned. My focus was primarily on getting jls to be balanced in his evaluation of the Dynamo. You were just a unpleasant diversion he injected to the conversation. Anyway, thanks for you concern.

jls · « **Reply #21 on:** March 31, 2009, 10:57:04 AM »

Steven, may I call you Steven. All I said was "how could this be" to Tizzle's post. He seem to say that he felt the Dynamo was not the "hook Monster" it was thought to be.

Now how is that not fair and balanced?

Why is it ok when a sawhead makes a claim that this ball is this or that, but when someone else makes a statement that differs, I'm unfair???

Now Steven, I don't have time to play with you today, and by the looks of it, you will have your hands full with CRD.

Good luck
--------------------
jls

bowlingnut07 · « **Reply #22 on:** March 31, 2009, 11:02:57 AM »

i just want to say im not a big lane#1 fan myself
HOWEVER i have drilled a dynamo and anyone who says this ball isnt a big hook ball is nuts. i have it and a virtual gravity wich was touted to be a hook monster and the dynamo out hooks it by a mile.

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #23 on:** March 31, 2009, 11:05:03 AM »

B'nut you can't say that
it disproves jls, and he won't stand for that

even though it's the truth
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

Steven · « **Reply #24 on:** March 31, 2009, 11:14:46 AM »

quote:
All I said was "how could this be" to Tizzle's post.

jls: Actually, you had a little more to say:

"Did you try it on those lanes that are 5 boards wider yet??? oops....It should be ok on them. oops"

"not the big hook monster it is made to be....The Dynamo??? How How can this be?....It said so....Boy I 'm sure glad we held up on making the lanes 5 boards wider"

"Is it still the ball of the year?....Silly me, hear I thought the Rogue Cell was, or should I say, will be"

quote:
Now how is that not fair and balanced?

If you really believe your above comments are 'fair and balanced', then maybe I've been over estimating you. You can however show some amends by helping CRD out. He currently thinks cover is 70% of reaction (or is it 90%?, hmmm), with the remainder undefined. He's made it clear it's not the core. Could it be his skills that he uses to 'make the ball move and the pins dance?' Maybe you could weigh in and help him out on this one.

jls · « **Reply #25 on:** March 31, 2009, 11:15:16 AM »

quote:
B'nut you can't say that
it disproves jls, and he won't stand for that

even though it's the truth
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

B-dawg, It was Tizzle who felt this ball was not the hook monster, not jls.

JLS was one of the first to widen the lanes.

And all JLS said was, "how could this be" to Tizzle comment that he felt the ball was not a "hook Monster"

Now Steven and B-dawg, since I valued your opinion's, my feeling's are hurt.

just in case you wanted to know

--------------------
jls

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #26 on:** March 31, 2009, 12:42:16 PM »

jls your full of it

b'nut 07 just said the dynamo was a hook monster, and that it out hooked the almighty virtual gravity by no less than 1 mile, and that goes against everything you have ever said

believe what you will
dynamo = real deal
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #27 on:** March 31, 2009, 12:58:57 PM »

i bet you kid can beat up mine too right
i bet your king of all things FIGJAM, and it runs in your whole family right

you probably haven't bowled since the 90's

whatever
your still a troll unlike jls who has since evolved

--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

jls · « **Reply #28 on:** March 31, 2009, 01:38:12 PM »

quote:
jls your full of it

b'nut 07 just said the dynamo was a hook monster, and that it out hooked the almighty virtual gravity by no less than 1 mile, and that goes against everything you have ever said

believe what you will
dynamo = real deal
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

B-dawg, I see your playing brain dead today.

Tizzle posted that he felt the ball wasn't the "Hook Monster" Now some sawhead comes on and post it is a hook monster. But you choose to ignore the post that said it wasn't!!!! But b-nut says it is, so that's the gospel according to Luke!!!!

Typical responce from you. You only hear what you want to hear. And I never compared it to anything as far as hook. Now I never thought this one month wonder was the "ball of the Year" but I don't recall comparing it to anything as far as hook goes.

Sales, you know, actual sales, maybe, but comparing it's hooking ability, no. I don't ever recall that.

How could I, Still have never seen a single human bowl with this ball!!!!

So I serious doubt, old sawhead boy, that I ever compared it's hook to the Virtual.

Now I 'm sure you will be able to post that thread where you claim I said the Virtual out hooked the Dynamo.

Might have said Out Sold!!!!

now

are we clear
--------------------
jls

Edited on 3/31/2009 1:42 PM

Edited on 3/31/2009 4:25 PM

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #29 on:** March 31, 2009, 01:49:22 PM »

ouch such hostility

whats the matter jls

your sister/wife holding out on you again

agreed heavy oil balls need oil to do their job best
all im saying, is you hype your precious VG like it was produced in heaven, and somebody who has tried them out side by side says different

none of this has anything to do w/ the OP's questions

so I take it back all the nice things i said about you
you = troll
hijacking, instigating, good for nothing troll
just like your brother

and it's no wonder you don't sell any balls your in here flapping your useless gums all the time

later trolls
--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

bowlerdawg · « **Reply #30 on:** March 31, 2009, 02:51:32 PM »

all the research is out there , and quite easy to find for anybody w/ a brain
what i hear you asking Steven is to reinvent the wheel.

original though comes from r & d guys who design ball cores

and for the record Stevens post are much more intelligent and well written than anything you have ever put up in here

--------------------
I'm your huckleberry

Author Topic: Dynamo question (Read 8318 times)

Storm269

Dynamo question

Steven

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question

jls

Re: Dynamo question

Steven

Re: Dynamo question

Steven

Re: Dynamo question

jls

Re: Dynamo question

bowlingnut07

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question

Steven

Re: Dynamo question

jls

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question

jls

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question

bowlerdawg

Re: Dynamo question