win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP  (Read 1845 times)

wer4u2nv

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« on: November 16, 2007, 12:50:59 AM »
Which ball would you guys suggest more for a houseshot that is medium oil and oiled about 38-40 feet.

 

MegaMav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2007, 08:53:21 AM »
Pearl Uranium if you can find it.
--------------------
BowlingChat.net - "Welcome to the Underground"
BowlingWiki.net - "Where Bowlers Write History"

novawagonmaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4279
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2007, 10:06:10 AM »
If only buying one ball, Pearl Uranium.
If looking for a good one/two punch...Supernova and Supernova XP.
In my mind, the Pearl Uranium would be a snug fit right in between them.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.

BuzzsawCrazy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 194
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2007, 01:42:58 PM »
Pearl Uranium
--------------------
In the bag:
Pearl Cherry C/2(2)
Cranberry
Pro Purple
Enriched Uranium
Cobalt Pearl
G-Force
Super Carbide Bomb
Crystal Diamond
Hack-Saw (RARE!!)
No Mercy

rhbowling07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2007, 02:50:21 PM »
for medium definitely uranium

triggerman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2007, 12:20:47 AM »
This post is funny, how can any of you other then deadmoney comment on which is better?  the XP is not even released yet.  and for my money the XP is more versitle then teh pearl u.  I found the pearl U to be a great bench mark ball, but also found it to be very heavy rolling and shorter then the XP on a house shot

I as well as others on here appreciate everyons input, but please dont comment on something you have not even thrown yet and make a comparison

Eric, we discussed this at great length, please take into account that people are recommending one ball over one they have not even thrown yet
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby



Edited on 11/17/2007 1:21 AM

novawagonmaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4279
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2007, 03:57:40 PM »
OK, so now that I have the XP and have thrown it for a few days, I suppose I am allowed to weigh in. In fact, last night, I took 4 balls to the lanes and threw a total of 5 games by throwing each  ball for a couple frames and moving to the next ball. I took my new XP, a Pearl Uranium, the Evolution, and the HRG. The Evolution is drilled pin over bridge (4.5" from PAP), CG out, and the other 3 are a label 1:30 drill...XP and PU have the pin 3.5" from PAP, and the HRG pin is a little closer at 2.5" from PAP.

The HRG was the straightest of the bunch, and therefore the easiest to control. It is a low flaring ball, so this is of no surprise. The Evolution was a little stronger and much more angular off the break. The XP was a little stronger yet, and was smoother than the Evo at the break, yet more angular than the HRG. The Pearl Uranium covered more boards than the other three balls, but was only slightly stronger than the XP...these two performed pretty close to each other shot after shot with the PU only covering 1 or two more boards. I did not take my original Supernova because I know that ball is a good bit stronger than all of the pearls listed.

So, in closing, I maintain my original stance on this topic.
If only buying one ball, you cannot go wrong if you can find an original Pearl Uranium. The XP would be a close fit if you cannot find one. And lastly, the Supernova and Supernova XP will be a devastating one-two punch!
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.

triggerman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2007, 08:35:33 PM »
Thank you Jon, that is EXACTLY what i see, I told Eric (original poster) basically the same, my grief was the whole hearted consensus for the pearl U I know it is a great ball but the xp is mightly close and readily available at this time

and you are right the solid and xp are a very tough 1-2 to beat

Thanks for a great comparison, I think that would shed a lot for most people

what do you think of the hit of the xp and solid vs the heavy uraniam cores?
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby


novawagonmaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4279
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2007, 06:44:17 AM »
quote:


what do you think of the hit of the xp and solid vs the heavy uraniam cores?
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby





Again...very close. The PU may actually hit a little harder, but I seem to notice the pins staying slightly lower with the XP. I had more "blowout" leaves with the PU. The XP seemed to mix the rack a little more.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.

Brickguy221

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9918
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2007, 11:28:30 AM »
quote:
I seem to notice the pins staying slightly lower with the XP.


Don't mean to hi-jack the topic, but what is in a ball where one ball will make the pins stay lower than another ball? I have always noticed that my Enriched Uranium seems to make the pins stay lower than my other balls. I use the same release on all of my balls, just play different angles with them.
--------------------
Brick
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away"

Warren300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: Pearl Uranium or Supernova XP
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2007, 11:40:16 AM »
I've noticed that the pins are staying lower since the change from Big B. I noticed it instantly with the HRG.