BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane #1 => Topic started by: Storm269 on March 14, 2007, 02:09:44 AM

Title: Tsunami vs Solid Uranium
Post by: Storm269 on March 14, 2007, 02:09:44 AM

Hi would like to know if you are given a choice would you get a Tsunami or a Solid Uranium (polished) for medium oil lane condition ?
--------------------
In my bag:
Carbide Plus
Enriched Uranium
Uranium HRG
Maxim Spare

Title: Re: Tsunami vs Solid Uranium
Post by: triggerman on March 14, 2007, 10:45:01 AM

tsunami hands down
both are solids
tsu is polised
solid is dull
tsu takes to surfce adjusts better
tsu has a revier core
solid has a center heavy rolly core
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Title: Re: Tsunami vs Solid Uranium
Post by: Rabiddog135 on March 14, 2007, 07:44:52 PM

i am with triggerman and TNT on this one even though I have never had a SU The Tsunami in my opinion is one of the best from lane 1 for true medium conditions
--------------------
Cobalt Pearl,Tsunami,XL,XXL,XXXL,
Pearl Cherry C2

Thats Just What I Carry In The Bag

And In Storage
Cobalt Bomb (NIB),BCB(X2-1 NIB),
Original SD(X2,NIB),
Golden Nugget,
Pearl Uranium
Pearl Cherry Bomb (X3-1NIB 1 is 16Lb)
SCB,
H2O,
Pink Raspberry (X1-16Lb)

And Always Looking For More

F.O.S. To The Bone
         

Title: Re: Tsunami vs Solid Uranium
Post by: Fatboy8 on March 15, 2007, 08:54:49 AM

Wow, guess I'll throw a wrench in things here, lol. I've had two Tsunami's, and neither were as good as my Solid U. I just didn't get a predictable roll from the Tsu's, but the Solid U is a very good/versitle/predictable ball.

I'd like to try a Tsunami again someday, but for me the Solid Uranium is money.
--------------------
Hammer-Lane #1-Ebonite-Brunswick