BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane Masters => Topic started by: Laybzz74 on October 28, 2009, 06:13:07 AM

Title: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Laybzz74 on October 28, 2009, 06:13:07 AM
... hearing and reading different things ...
--------------------
**** Official "L/LM" ball "junkie" ****

http://www.lanemastersbowling.com
 
 "Master the Lanes with Legendary hitting power" !!!

Robb in O''Fallon, IL 62269 (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM (Email addy)
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: charlest on October 28, 2009, 06:55:59 PM
Ok, I'll bite. What problems are you seeing or hearing about?
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Laybzz74 on October 28, 2009, 08:48:13 PM
Not problems, Jeff ... just conflicting info on whether they are reactive pearls or particle pearls L/M web site has the BA as P Prl and BTM has it as R Prl ...
--------------------
**** Official "L/LM" ball "junkie" ****

http://www.lanemastersbowling.com
 
 "Master the Lanes with Legendary hitting power" !!!

Robb in O'Fallon, IL 62269 (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM (Email addy)
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: charlest on October 28, 2009, 10:10:52 PM
Well, Tony Martin, posting on here, has, I believe, already called the Xtreme a Particle Pearl. BJI called the BA a particle Pearl. I'd go with that.
Since Tony has replaced Galen, I'd have to trust his word.

I'd ask him about the BA, if you still in doubt.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Laybzz74 on October 28, 2009, 10:15:22 PM
Thanx all ..
--------------------
**** Official "L/LM" ball "junkie" ****

http://www.lanemastersbowling.com
 
 "Master the Lanes with Legendary hitting power" !!!

Robb in O'Fallon, IL 62269 (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM (Email addy)
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: TM3 LMBowling on October 29, 2009, 12:04:06 PM
Buzz Attack - Light Load Particle Pearl

Xtreme Damage Medium load Particle Pearl

Thanks TM


--------------------
Tony Martin
Lane Masters Bowling
The Worlds Best Made Bowling Balls"
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: LaneHammer20 on October 29, 2009, 12:39:43 PM
xtreme damage looks like a Terminator remake with a different core.

TM3. d you wnat to tell us what differences we will se betwern the 2
--------------------
What is sandbagging???

Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: alex on October 29, 2009, 01:31:53 PM
What type of oil condition is the B.A.made for?
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: charlest on October 29, 2009, 03:40:44 PM
quote:
What type of oil condition is the B.A.made for?


As far as I know, medium to medium+ oil, for average revs, average ball speed.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: alex on October 30, 2009, 11:49:21 AM
Thanks Charlest
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: TM3 LMBowling on October 30, 2009, 03:00:40 PM
Terminator Vs Xtreme

I made the Xtreme with a more versatile cover. It will come in sheen with grey pad. The backend response with Grey pad with a medium particle load is much more significant than polished. But I also took the ball to a high polish before applying grey pad to give it the clean fronts it has. Smooth through the fronts and stronger in the back.

Terminator had the hard particles so it was a little harder to match the ball to the condition unless all you wanted was hook. The cover on the Terminator could not be manipulated like the Xtreme can.

Hope that answers the questions.
TM

--------------------
Tony Martin
Lane Masters Bowling
The Worlds Best Made Bowling Balls"
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: leftyinsnellville on October 30, 2009, 03:09:25 PM
quote:
What type of oil condition is the B.A.made for?


It is pretty strong.  My BA goes a little longer than my Yeah Baby and moves really strong off the pattern.  Probably the biggest moving symmetrical ball I own.

For instance, I was using it first shift on a fresh house shot last night and I had to throw it pretty hard to keep it from jumping too high.  I switched to my Immortal Solid and was able to throw the same line without having to muscle it.  My Immortal Solid has a fairly strong drill and have the coverstock at 2000 abralon.  It''s a flare monster.
--------------------
I wanna be a house hack when I grow up.

http://averagebowlersballreviews.com/


Edited on 10/30/2009 3:11 PM
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: afitz on October 31, 2009, 10:25:25 AM
The fact still remains the same OLD LEGENDS PARTICLES AND RESIN FORMULATION WORKS FOR EVERY BODY. The new legends bowling balls work best for new followers. These are the people who have thrown Virtual Gravity's, Cell's, Black Widow's that won't last but 20 games etc. etc.

P.S. If these new customers would have thrown legends back in the day. They would be saying the same thing I am. PLEASE OH PLEASE MR. FRED BORDEN get better. Please take over the company that you and MR. SAM BACA BUILT together.

Shots Out To JOSE CUERVO.
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: LaneHammer20 on October 31, 2009, 01:22:09 PM
quote:
The fact still remains the same OLD LEGENDS PARTICLES AND RESIN FORMULATION WORKS FOR EVERY BODY. The new legends bowling balls work best for new followers. These are the people who have thrown Virtual Gravity's, Cell's, Black Widow's that won't last but 20 games etc. etc.

P.S. If these new customers would have thrown legends back in the day. They would be saying the same thing I am. PLEASE OH PLEASE MR. FRED BORDEN get better. Please take over the company that you and MR. SAM BACA BUILT together.

Shots Out To JOSE CUERVO.



I believe they are making stuff the match up to a broader group of people today moreso than their older stuff. One reason in the ability to be able o adjust the cover uch easier. The older diamond particles were just to hard to cut with regular abrlon pads or sandpaper from  what I have heard. You either had a polished surface or a or a unpolished surface. That is pretty black or white.

I didnt get to roll some of the older pieces other than the Big bang which I loved, and now have a very weak drilled New standard that is money on medium to med-light patterns and shorter patterns, one I will never get rid of. I have been trying to pick up some more older pieces since they are sought after even today.

Now with what TM3 said about the Xtreme damage haveing softer particles, my only hope is are they going to have the same durability as your past releases. Maybe you can shine some light on the aspect for us.

Oh and PS, bring back a Buzz please, I am sure others will comment on this.
--------------------
What is sandbagging???

Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: afitz on October 31, 2009, 08:29:21 PM
The idea might be to open up to a broader group of people, but i don't see it. All you have to do with there older pieces ex. The New Standard and Big Bang far as adjusting the cover is to use Sand Paper, Scotch Bright and Polish to smooth out the lines and cover. I too have a New Standard, Guaranteed. I am currently using them in my league. I would like to see LEGEND LANEMASTERS go old school. LANEMASTER balls would chase the oil line and LEGENDS would blend the patterns.

P.S. there are plenty of buzz out there. www.bowlingballmall.com has those. The Original Absolute Power, Satisfaxion and Masterpiece are excellent for medium to medium dry patterns. If they would bring those back. You wouldn't need a buzz.
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Graaille on October 31, 2009, 10:31:16 PM
quote:
The Original Absolute Power, Satisfaxion and Masterpiece are excellent for medium to medium dry patterns. If they would bring those back. You wouldn't need a buzz.


Although I love all three of the pieces you just named, there's always room for The Buzz in my bag.  All depends on your technique in playing the lanes.
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: charlest on November 01, 2009, 06:21:13 AM
quote:
quote:
The Original Absolute Power, Satisfaxion and Masterpiece are excellent for medium to medium dry patterns. If they would bring those back. You wouldn''t need a buzz.


Although I love all three of the pieces you just named, there''s always room for The Buzz in my bag.  All depends on your technique in playing the lanes.


I have to agree with Graaille on this one. I''ve had all thre of the above. The Buzz was a better all around ball for me.

The Masterpiece never covered medium-light for me. It was medium to medium-heavy oil ball for me. That ball had an almost particle pearl reaction for me - very strong.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Edited on 11/1/2009 7:21 AM
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Carlos Colon on November 01, 2009, 07:48:04 PM
How does the Xtreme Damage compare to the WCPP in terms of handling oil?
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: TM3 LMBowling on November 02, 2009, 11:53:49 AM
XD -vs- WCPP

The Covers are very similar in formulation. Should be able to perform well in the oil. I needed to polish mine for the Medium/medium Heavy oil. I am rev dominant so this might give you a little insight on why I need polish.

The whole reason for making the covers easier to manipulate. This ball is 2 piece and will last a very long time. But I wanted to make sure it will work for many lane conditions.

I see your point about the old Particles but it is not realistic in the future. Many of you know me and the fact of the matter is we can not use that particle except for special releases. It is too hard to cut in the lathe and our maintenance bills went way up when we used the old Particle. From a business standpoint it is better to make a more versatile cover and serve more people than destroy our equipment when manufacturing the older particle balls.

I hope this gives you a little insight as to why I am developing durable easy to manipulate covers. I'm not saying we will never use the old particle again it will just be in special releases.
--------------------
Tony Martin
Lane Masters Bowling
The Worlds Best Made Bowling Balls"
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: zorchman on November 03, 2009, 06:56:58 PM
if you dont like um send them to me ill keepem rolling for you.i have been bowling 4 nites a week ill squeeze them into one of those nites for you.
--------------------
you haven"t really been beaten you just been tracked
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: dennis_michael on November 04, 2009, 07:47:18 AM
Tony,
I put my 5 y/o Terminator through a Revivor machine baking process at the proshop.  I maintain it well, but was surprised to see the clear oil coming out.

When it was done, about half hour at 150*, wiped off twice, I rolled it.  It lost its back end.  It is now a medium lane ball.

Any recommendations?
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: charlest on November 04, 2009, 09:37:53 AM
quote:
Tony,
I put my 5 y/o Terminator through a Revivor machine baking process at the proshop.  I maintain it well, but was surprised to see the clear oil coming out.

When it was done, about half hour at 150*, wiped off twice, I rolled it.  It lost its back end.  It is now a medium lane ball.

Any recommendations?


FWIW -
Most procedures for this recommend sanding the ball dull, like around 400 grit, before using the Revivor. Seems the theory is it opens up the pores to let the oil out more easily. Afterwards, you bring the surface back up to spec.

Sometimes balls need more time than 30 minutes. It has probably soaked up a lot if it has lost some performance.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: killpins on November 04, 2009, 11:12:07 PM
i read many times that it's better to sand the ball to 400 and make a bath into a hot water instead of use a oven to extract the oil from the cover of a ball?
is The oven method  good to reduce the longevity of the ball and his performances?
Any suggestions?
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Graaille on November 05, 2009, 03:34:52 PM
They were probably referring to an ''at home oven'' that also doubles as a turkey burner towards the end of November.  In that case - yes, a hot water bath is definately preferable - especially if you want to keep your ball for longer than a couple of months.  

However a Revivor oven is the preferred way of extracting oil (as far as the ball manufacturers are concerned) due to it''s ability to maintain a consistant level of heat (120-130 degrees) over a long period of time.

And now that we''ve gotten wildly OT from the original post - back to any/all questions about the XD/BA please.

Edited on 11/5/2009 4:36 PM
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: Laybzz74 on November 05, 2009, 04:44:00 PM
TY !!!
--------------------
**** Official "L/LM" ball "junkie" ****

http://www.lanemastersbowling.com
 
 "Master the Lanes with Legendary hitting power" !!!

Robb in O'Fallon, IL 62269 (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM (Email addy)
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: dennis_michael on November 06, 2009, 06:34:50 AM
Sorry to send this topic off.  But, here is an update.

After practicing quite a few times with my Terminator on fresh oil, Its finish came back, the revs are up, and its again slamming the pins.  My take is that I was on less oil than I needed.   It was probably rolling out.  I love oil.

Now back to the topic.
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: killpins on November 06, 2009, 09:07:48 AM
afitz
i'm agree with you about old legends, in fact my arsenal include only old lanemaster model but the first Buzz is very very good ball that it can cover many condition from light to medium + ( keep in mind own style, rev rate speed)
about the buzz attack i read the BTM review and the post on this site, probably it can be a good ball but my opinion is another : Legends are known for a 2piece construction and the movement on the lane and the impact is awesome, also the longevity of the ball vs another brand (with the same maintenance) is higher so the buzz attack is not a 2 piece construc so is life will be long or as an Ebonite ?
I wrote ebonite because i drilled many ebonite and i know their life (very good ball but 100% on first games and 50% or less after 50/60 games).
Now i had the opportunity to buy a pair of Big Kahuna, Masterpiece and Yeah Baby nib from a seller so i will extend my arsenal to others (probably) excellent old balls.
Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: LaneHammer20 on November 06, 2009, 11:46:23 AM
There non 2 piece balls will still last way longer than any other companies. They still use the same grade A resin that doesn't allow oil to absorb as easily. Along with from the ones I have sen they are fairly thick. Like 5/8 to wqhat looks like 7/8.

I will say I am unsure they made the Buzz attack a non 2 piece since all the other in that line were truew 2 pieces. still looks like a awesome ball and one I will be picking up sooner or later.
--------------------
What is sandbagging???

Title: Re: Coverstocks on the Buzz Attack and the Xtreme Damage ???
Post by: WHOS THAT on November 06, 2009, 08:36:52 PM
quote:
There non 2 piece balls will still last way longer than any other companies. They still use the same grade A resin that doesn't allow oil to absorb as easily. Along with from the ones I have sen they are fairly thick. Like 5/8 to wqhat looks like 7/8.

I will say I am unsure they made the Buzz attack a non 2 piece since all the other in that line were truew 2 pieces. still looks like a awesome ball and one I will be picking up sooner or later.
--------------------
What is sandbagging???




Pick one up! I picked one up three weeks ago, I'm beyond impressed with it's consistance, and pin carry. It gives me a whole new look.
--------------------
Fall Arsenal 2009
Terminator
Terminator Rebellion
Buzz Attack
Xtreme Damage (Coming Soon)
Black Diamond
Track Spare Ball