BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane Masters => Topic started by: knnydukes on May 21, 2009, 08:00:53 AM

Title: WC P/P, The Sting, Sure Strike?????????
Post by: knnydukes on May 21, 2009, 08:00:53 AM

I have recently acquired the aforementioned balls. According to the Lane Masters website, The WC P/P is able to handle more oil than the Sting followed by the Sure Strike. However, according to Bowlers Journal International, the WC P/P fits in nicely between the Sting and the Sure Strike????
    How about some real world feedback from the bowlers who actually use these products? What do you guys/gals think about the pecking order of these balls?
     Thanks in advance for any help in this conundrum. Ken Dukes

Title: Re: WC P/P, The Sting, Sure Strike?????????
Post by: SVstar34 on May 21, 2009, 04:04:06 PM

why not throw them first and tell us what you see?
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Rogue Cell (coming soon)
Bounty(4.5 x 4.75 Fresh 1000 Abralon)
Twisted Fury(5 x 4 500 Abralon + Reacta Shine)
Raw Hammer Pain(Leverage 1000 Abralon)
Blue Vibe(5 x 5 4000 Abralon + Reacta Shine)

Title: Re: WC P/P, The Sting, Sure Strike?????????
Post by: knnydukes on May 21, 2009, 04:30:34 PM

They haven't been drilled yet. Thanks for your input though. Ken

Title: Re: WC P/P, The Sting, Sure Strike?????????
Post by: Graaille on May 22, 2009, 08:46:51 AM

IMHO - it works out to the shape of the shot more than the amount of oil that they can handle. But if you're going off of just the amount of oil - then it would be Sting -> WC/PP -> Sure Strike. (heavier to lighter)

But each of them can be easily changed to handle most any pattern (The Sting would need to be polished quite a bit to handle lighter than med tho)

Edited on 5/22/2009 3:54 PM

Title: Re: WC P/P, The Sting, Sure Strike?????????
Post by: Gazoo on May 22, 2009, 09:01:46 AM

SS is stonger than one might think. I would go with a Hornet instead with that lineup.
--------------------
"I don't want to be remembered, I want to be forgotten"