BallReviews

General Category => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: strikeking12 on December 12, 2017, 11:01:19 AM

Title: About making some balls illegal
Post by: strikeking12 on December 12, 2017, 11:01:19 AM
How a bout making "two-handed" deliveries illegal?  This makes a huge difference in "pin carry".
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Juggernaut on December 12, 2017, 11:05:42 AM
NO
JUST NO
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Kegler300800 on December 12, 2017, 11:07:49 AM
And what? you're jealous? Boy, that's enough reason to make it illegal.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: charlest on December 12, 2017, 11:11:33 AM
How about just defining the difference between the Game of Bowling and the Sport of Bowling?
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: SVstar34 on December 12, 2017, 11:23:23 AM
How about just defining the difference between the Game of Bowling and the Sport of Bowling?

Yes please
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: tloy on December 12, 2017, 11:25:22 AM
Well said as usual, Charlest :)
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Gene J Kanak on December 12, 2017, 12:05:29 PM
That's what people just can't seem to comprehend. In the competitive environment, the best bowlers still win 99.9% of the time. The only place where the equipment muddies the waters is in the THS league environment where people can spray the lanes and still hit high flush with good carry all night long.

If you put most house hacks (myself included) up against a true pro on a tough pattern, that pro could dominate them in most instances using urethane or plastic even if the amateur were allowed to use whatever he or she wanted. Talent still wins out the overwhelming majority of the time.

Also, let's not forget that equipment layout, coverstock prep, and selection is a new element that makes today's bowlers have to think about and account for more than the bowlers of yesteryear. Now, instead of just having one or two balls to think about, you have to mentally scroll through your entire arsenal to determine when and if better options are available. To some, that isn't as skillful as changing hand positions, lofting, etc. To me, it's a different type of skill that bowlers in the past didn't have.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: milorafferty on December 12, 2017, 12:55:25 PM
How a bout making "two-handed" deliveries illegal?  This makes a huge difference in "pin carry".

Oh yea, and left handed bowlers too. Heck, anyone who does it different than me, kick their ass out. Now you darn kids stay off my lawn...

Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: giddyupddp on December 12, 2017, 01:00:20 PM
Agree with all below
And makes me all the more positive in asking why is the USBC concerned with or considering going backwards with equipment? As others have said there are so many alternative to bowling the USBC should just be concerned with maintaining membership levels and trying to come up with ideas that will bring in new bowlers just to replace those who retire from the game.

That's what people just can't seem to comprehend. In the competitive environment, the best bowlers still win 99.9% of the time. The only place where the equipment muddies the waters is in the THS league environment where people can spray the lanes and still hit high flush with good carry all night long.

If you put most house hacks (myself included) up against a true pro on a tough pattern, that pro could dominate them in most instances using urethane or plastic even if the amateur were allowed to use whatever he or she wanted. Talent still wins out the overwhelming majority of the time.

Also, let's not forget that equipment layout, coverstock prep, and selection is a new element that makes today's bowlers have to think about and account for more than the bowlers of yesteryear. Now, instead of just having one or two balls to think about, you have to mentally scroll through your entire arsenal to determine when and if better options are available. To some, that isn't as skillful as changing hand positions, lofting, etc. To me, it's a different type of skill that bowlers in the past didn't have.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: rocky61201 on December 12, 2017, 02:08:34 PM
I'm a house hack and only bowl in two leagues this season, both with THS patterns and I have to do battle weekly with two handers, no thumb lofters/crankers, plastic ball straight shooters, carry down, fried heads, burnt up mid lanes, ect. ect.  It is frustrating at times, but it is my choice.  In my area we have scratch leagues with a different sport shot every week and even a scratch league with 1 plastic ball only.  Fortunately I have those options if I choose them.

It sucks if you don't have those choices but in the end making up of bunch of new rules to suit your desires isn't the answer.  Maybe try volunteering to be league president and start up a league that has the rules you want.  Maybe you get enough buy in, maybe you won't. 

I'm betting if you open the discussion with the 1st rule being no two handers, most of the traditional competitive 1 hander guys would say, "Why??? I enjoy beating those guys."

Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Impending Doom on December 12, 2017, 02:33:33 PM
How about just defining the difference between the Game of Bowling and the Sport of Bowling?
Don't even get me started on this topic.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: northface28 on December 12, 2017, 02:52:38 PM
USBC does this, itll be enough for a lot of people to say "fuck it" and move on. And once theyre gone, theyre not coming back.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: 2handedrook12 on December 12, 2017, 04:52:37 PM
USBC does this, itll be enough for a lot of people to say "fuck it" and move on. And once theyre gone, theyre not coming back.
Agreed.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Impending Doom on December 12, 2017, 05:29:44 PM
Hey, remember when they changed the max diff from .080 to .060? Remember when scores went plummeting down?

Yeah, me neither. If anything, scores went up. Undrilled diff doesn't mean shit anymore. Ask Mo how to get around that. Or, look at the Honey Badger. Everyone thought that ball would be a dart with that high rg and lower diff. But the ball hooks like nobody's business.

The problem isn't the balls undrilled numbers. The balls with super aggressive covers don't last long on the market. It's the condition. The playing field is so easy that you can use almost anything on a walled up house shot and score. When the condition is tough, it's more about the bowler and not the ball.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: ignitebowling on December 12, 2017, 06:30:54 PM
Many still argue that bowling has lost sooooooo many league bowlers because it was too easy and scores were too high?  Look at all of these pro bowlers from years past continuing to echo this as recently as Bo Burton.

Then you look at bowlers and society up until the late 80s and what was available for your entertainment dollar vs late 80s moving forward to today and you can see why so many people would no longer wish to commit to 32-36 week leagues.

Here is the funny secret..many bowling centers are using a failing business model and not adapting to todays bowlers/consumers. I am 36, I started bowling league as a junior in 1996-97 roughly and really enjoy bowling. I do not wish to continue bowling in 36 week leagues every year.

Lots of businesses and restaurants fail, including large chains. None are immune to bad business and failing to keep up with changes in society. League bowling is failing in that market and bowling center owners and USBC can't figure  out why. Lets blame scores and equipment. By that logic USBCs open championship should be growing every year because of how difficult the conditions are....but it is not.

Everyone in league should be averaging 190 plus because bowling is easy.....yet when looking across many leagues we see plenty of lower average bowlers no different then in the 1950s to 1980s aka the golden years.

Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: bradl on December 12, 2017, 08:41:10 PM
How a bout making "two-handed" deliveries illegal?  This makes a huge difference in "pin carry".

The same thing was said about Mike Miller when he started bowling with no thumb. Look at how many titles he has compared to WRWJ, as he was prominent during Walter's time. Same with him applied to Aulby, Duke, Criss, Learn, Voss, and many others at that time.

My point: Dale Carnegie's quote always come to the fore:

Only fools criticize, condemn, and complain - and most people do.

Instead of complaining about two-handers, how about do what the ladies have done, as they have every right to complain about men when it comes to pin carry: concentrate on shot making, and pure each shot. If you're worried about pin carry, how about worrying less about how much room you have for a shot and start working on repeating your shot each and every time, give/take 2 boards on each side of your target, and have your shot be so pure that you don't have to worry about wildly aggressive pin carry.

two-handers don't scare Liz Johnson. they didn't scare Rhino, Lavoie, or any others who have won or think that they have an advantage.

My point: stop worrying about what you can't control, and start worrying about what you CAN CONTROL: your game.

BL.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: northface28 on December 12, 2017, 09:14:31 PM
Many still argue that bowling has lost sooooooo many league bowlers because it was too easy and scores were too high?  Look at all of these pro bowlers from years past continuing to echo this as recently as Bo Burton.

Then you look at bowlers and society up until the late 80s and what was available for your entertainment dollar vs late 80s moving forward to today and you can see why so many people would no longer wish to commit to 32-36 week leagues.

Here is the funny secret..many bowling centers are using a failing business model and not adapting to todays bowlers/consumers. I am 36, I started bowling league as a junior in 1996-97 roughly and really enjoy bowling. I do not wish to continue bowling in 36 week leagues every year.

Lots of businesses and restaurants fail, including large chains. None are immune to bad business and failing to keep up with changes in society. League bowling is failing in that market and bowling center owners and USBC can't figure  out why. Lets blame scores and equipment. By that logic USBCs open championship should be growing every year because of how difficult the conditions are....but it is not.

Everyone in league should be averaging 190 plus because bowling is easy.....yet when looking across many leagues we see plenty of lower average bowlers no different then in the 1950s to 1980s aka the golden years.



Idk who you are, but i like you.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: giddyupddp on December 12, 2017, 11:50:56 PM
+1, all this below

Many still argue that bowling has lost sooooooo many league bowlers because it was too easy and scores were too high?  Look at all of these pro bowlers from years past continuing to echo this as recently as Bo Burton.

Then you look at bowlers and society up until the late 80s and what was available for your entertainment dollar vs late 80s moving forward to today and you can see why so many people would no longer wish to commit to 32-36 week leagues.

Here is the funny secret..many bowling centers are using a failing business model and not adapting to todays bowlers/consumers. I am 36, I started bowling league as a junior in 1996-97 roughly and really enjoy bowling. I do not wish to continue bowling in 36 week leagues every year.

Lots of businesses and restaurants fail, including large chains. None are immune to bad business and failing to keep up with changes in society. League bowling is failing in that market and bowling center owners and USBC can't figure  out why. Lets blame scores and equipment. By that logic USBCs open championship should be growing every year because of how difficult the conditions are....but it is not.

Everyone in league should be averaging 190 plus because bowling is easy.....yet when looking across many leagues we see plenty of lower average bowlers no different then in the 1950s to 1980s aka the golden years.



Idk who you are, but i like you.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Cornerpin on December 13, 2017, 07:06:53 AM
"My point: stop worrying about what you can't control, and start worrying about what you CAN CONTROL: your game."


Truer words have never been said.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: AlonzoHarris on December 13, 2017, 11:07:55 AM
We don't have any scratch or sport leagues in the two centers I bowl in weekly. I would like to see one of my regular THS Handicap leagues shortened to 22-24 weeks and run a 10 week scratch sport league afterwards in that same time slot to round out the season for those that want the extra challenge and time in the bowling alley.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: leftybowler70 on December 13, 2017, 11:24:03 AM
Some well stated and accurate assessments here....
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: HackJandy on December 13, 2017, 12:30:41 PM
This might not be a popular opinion but I currently love the state of bowling in my little world.  Plenty of killer balls that help out us low rev guys.  The local lanes are all corporate but seem to be doing ok (edge to living in big metro area).  I love my doubles league and the open bowling I can get fairly cheap.  I understand the competition aspect of bowling is completely FUBAR but I am old enough to be comfortable with never going pro.  I just want the game to outlast me.  Don't punish weekend Joe Stroker with the low revs because two handed monsters are blowing up shitty patterns the USBC puts out.  Lots more Joes than pros.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Rileybowler on December 13, 2017, 02:03:46 PM
Well you could learn the 2 handed delivery if you think it is such an advantage then it should be worth your time to learn, but you probably will not try to learn it you will just complain. You could also take some lessons spend some time learning to become more competitive.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: HackJandy on December 13, 2017, 02:09:18 PM
Well you could learn the 2 handed delivery if you think it is such an advantage then it should be worth your time to learn, but you probably will not try to learn it you will just complain. You could also take some lessons spend some time learning to become more competitive.

Well being a low rev speed dominant stroker used to everyone being left of me so perfectly fine personally with two handers.  I guess some of the cranker one handers don't like people left of them.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: n00dlejester on December 28, 2017, 11:04:20 AM
I had no idea this USBC story was even a thing. Boy did I do some reading this morning.

Is there a target date for these changes to take place?
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Luke Rosdahl on December 28, 2017, 11:16:00 AM
I was about to say it probably won't because Chad wouldn't be dumb enough to bite the hand that feeds . . but then I remembered we were talking about Chad and so probably in the next few months . .

I had no idea this USBC story was even a thing. Boy did I do some reading this morning.

Is there a target date for these changes to take place?
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: n00dlejester on December 28, 2017, 11:47:56 AM
HA! I don't know Chad at all, but the lack of faith in the man is amusing.

And on that topic - I've heard a lot of folks throw shade over to Chad. I know nothing of the man. Would you (or anybody) share why Chad's generally frowned upon?

I was about to say it probably won't because Chad wouldn't be dumb enough to bite the hand that feeds . . but then I remembered we were talking about Chad and so probably in the next few months . .

I had no idea this USBC story was even a thing. Boy did I do some reading this morning.

Is there a target date for these changes to take place?
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: JessN16 on January 05, 2018, 01:59:04 AM
I haven't had access to sport shots in a decade. However, about 4 years ago I joined a normal THS league, local to me, and the manager is a gentleman who retired after 40 years in the industry in Ohio and moved south. Old-school guy to the core; I bought his AMF sidewinder drill press from him.

My average immediately dropped 30+ pins when I started bowling on his league. Why? The shot was quite flat, long and heavy. League nights were tough. But they made me a better tournament bowler.

Just this year, he's backed off on the difficulty a tad (I'm back up about 15 pins, certainly not all 30 that I was down), at the behest of some of our older bowlers who can't rev it up as much anymore. My point is I have 67 bowling balls in my drill room right now and all it took to make me look average again was an oil man.

The houses could rein in scores tomorrow if they wanted to. They just don't want to. If the USBC starts fiddling with the equipment, scores will come down and the bowlers will blame the house. That's not conducive to increased business.

I've been saying this same thing for 20 years now: Scores are higher across the board, that's life, accept it and move on. Create a new normal for judging talent, just like we have over the years in golf and baseball as fitness, weight training, equipment changes, etc., had their effect on the game. Why bowling believes it has any right to be different speaks to the rank arrogance of the people who see themselves as "gatekeepers."

Aside from the intramural leagues I bowled on as a college student, I've never bowled without certifying. If the USBC truly is about to go down this path, I won't give a da*n if I ever certify or bowl in a tournament again.

Jess
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: HackJandy on January 05, 2018, 10:09:44 AM
Preach on brother Jess.  Every ball I have bought since hearing about this silliness has had a diff greater than .05.  Not giving another dime to the USBC until Chad is gone.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: Impending Doom on January 05, 2018, 10:23:00 AM
Let's just ban bowling balls. All they do is wreck the pattern and knock over pins.

Stupid bowling balls.
Title: Re: About making some balls illegal
Post by: AlonzoHarris on January 05, 2018, 10:26:32 AM
Let's just ban bowling balls. All they do is wreck the pattern and knock over pins.

Stupid bowling balls.

Lets just stick to Candlepin bowling. Made that little ball checkmark shape up on that dust pattern they had on the lane.