win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Amateurs?  (Read 1155 times)

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4583
  • Former proshop worker
Amateurs?
« on: July 15, 2003, 04:41:16 PM »
I feel one of bowlings problems is the definition of an amateur. There are literally hundreds of bowlers in the U.S. today making their living by bowling and are not considered to be “professional bowlers” simply because they do not belong to the PBA. Bowling has always had this shady side, hustlers, and even the old company leagues (the old beer leagues) and the such. But with bowling companies sponsoring “amateurs” and the proliferation of mega-buck “amateur” events it has become ridiculous. Tim Mack is a professional by any definition of the word except in bowling.

Golf has strict guidelines. I’m not sure what the exact number is but it use to be if you accepted a prize over $400 you became a professional in the view of the USGA. They just had a guy declared as a professional for winning a car from the Tiger Buick promotion. He cannot enter any amateur events for a year and must petition the USGA to regain his amateur status.

Golf is experiencing some of this problem in that kids in college who are given equipment, practice facilities, and entries into tournaments are now dominating USGA “amateur events”.

A true amateur is someone who works another job at least 40+ hours a week, is involved with their family, and still finds time to participate in their sport.  

 

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4332
Re: Amateurs?
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2003, 08:52:48 AM »
I do agree with you about this.  Tim Mack is definitely a professional.  However, there are going to be those guys who have a pretty high average (225+) and is known in their area, but they do no have the funds for all the traveling expenses and entry fees.  I, for one hand, had my lowest book average for the past 3 years, of at least 90 games, sitting at 234.  But, because of some choices I decided to make, have other financial responsibilities outside of bowling, and therefore, do not get out and bowl more "amateur" tournaments.  So, there are guys who are going to do nothing but hit the local tournaments and clean house because there really aren't too many other local bowlers who can compete with that person.  We have several guys in the Atlanta area who would be considered pros, but they just choose not to get their cards, because the local tournys forbid a card holder to bowl in them.  A bowler can tell us all day that he is just an "amateur".  But, there is no reason to insult another bowler's intelligence in the process.  Would you consider those to be "semi-pros"?
--------------------
If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

mumzie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6914
Re: Amateurs?
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2003, 09:23:22 AM »
Pinbuster - FYI - by your definition, I am an amateur.
And, if the PWBA folds, I will again be an amateur.

BUT - let's talk about the definition of amateur in other sports - since the Olympics changed their definition a few years ago, WHO has been playing on the US BASKETBALL TEAM??? I think a couple of years ago the salaries of the 5 starting AMATEURS was something like 20-30 million a year. Geez - I wish I could be a bowling AMATEUR and make that kind of money...

It's not just bowling any more.
--------------------
Bowling? Of course it's a sport.
------------------------
www.Shirts4Bowling.com
We Know What Bowlers Want

Home of the HAMBONE shirt!