win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Benchmark Asymmetric  (Read 4253 times)

todvan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Benchmark Asymmetric
« on: September 11, 2018, 07:13:22 AM »
With the new rules eliminating balance holes, asymmetric cored balls will be the best way to get the layout that you need.

However, current asymmetric balls are geared towards those who need a strong ball. For a number of bowlers, these balls are too strong for playing the typical house shot. An asymmetric cored ball with medium differentials and medium cover would be better.

The first company to produce a benchmark asymmetric ball wins!
MOTIV Jackal LE .................40 x 4.5 x 40 p2.5
MOTIV Revolt Vengeance......45 x 4.0 x 50 p3
MOTIV Forza GT ..................50 x 4.0 x 70 p2.5
MOTIV Sigma Sting..............50 x 4.0 x 45 p3

 

sneaky PETE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Benchmark Asymmetric
« Reply #16 on: September 15, 2018, 06:40:54 PM »
wouldn't all the code series be good for that.
can i AXE you a question

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: Benchmark Asymmetric
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2018, 11:00:32 AM »
The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix don't count as asyms. The Code X, Black Ops series, do count.
Their asymmetry isn't strong enough. .008  and above count asasyms.

The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix start out with mild asymmetry which is what makes them well suited as benchmark asymmetricals.  Depending on the layout, they can easily end up with the same intermediate diff that the Code X and Black Ops balls start with.

If they don't count as asymmetricals, then the manufacturers wouldn't be allowed to advertise them as such.
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

BowlingForDonuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Benchmark Asymmetric
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2018, 11:27:49 AM »
The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix don't count as asyms. The Code X, Black Ops series, do count.
Their asymmetry isn't strong enough. .008  and above count asasyms.

The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix start out with mild asymmetry which is what makes them well suited as benchmark asymmetricals.  Depending on the layout, they can easily end up with the same intermediate diff that the Code X and Black Ops balls start with.

If they don't count as asymmetricals, then the manufacturers wouldn't be allowed to advertise them as such.

Mo and even Track have shown how its not hard to have both a symmetric or asym ball based on the drilling.  Tend to agree though don't really start seeing the classic asym traits until reach .01 int diff or above unless you use exotic drillings or something.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2018, 12:37:52 PM by BowlingForDonuts »
Here today.  Gone tomorrow.

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8150
Re: Benchmark Asymmetric
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2018, 12:01:09 PM »
The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix don't count as asyms. The Code X, Black Ops series, do count.
Their asymmetry isn't strong enough. .008  and above count asasyms.

The Kinetics, Honey Badger, and Matrix start out with mild asymmetry which is what makes them well suited as benchmark asymmetricals.  Depending on the layout, they can easily end up with the same intermediate diff that the Code X and Black Ops balls start with.
If they don't count as asymmetricals, then the manufacturers wouldn't be allowed to advertise them as such.


I thought the definition of asymmetrical was based on the core shape, not the dynamics of the ball?

_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: Benchmark Asymmetric
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2018, 01:34:56 PM »
.008 is the point where assymetry starts to show, but I don't really notice it until you get into the .015 arena.