win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Bowling Ball Concept  (Read 3559 times)

AlonzoHarris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
Bowling Ball Concept
« on: March 12, 2018, 07:41:32 AM »
Had a thought come to me. Quite confident manufactures facilities are not properly equipped to full fill this but follow me here as Storm/RG as the example.

Ordering sheet:
1. Choose Weight

2. Choose Coverstock
 - R2S Solid
 - R2S Pearl
 - R2S Hybrid
 - R3S...
 - Etc...

3. Choose Weightblock
 - Inverted Fe2
 - Centripetal
 - Etc....

4. Choose Colors (3 Max)

5. Choose Name & Font

6. Choose Logo

Essentially you get to build-a-bear your bowling ball. They could grey out certain options based on other choices as well if they feel like the combination would give a bad look for the company in ball names or cover/core combos.
Current Rotation:
PhysiX
Code X
Code Black
Axiom Pearl
Phaze III
Trend
IQ Tour

 

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2018, 09:26:05 AM »
Excellent marketing idea. No clue how many hundred dollars it would cost for profits to be correct for Utah.

As far logo it should have to be the logo for the core. 

It's the inverted fe2 then it gets a hyroad. And becomes r2X solid hyroad or NRG Pearl hyroad. That way there are zero problems with logos or names.

Lock core would be a lock logo etc.

Picking colors or logo colors would be plenty.

I would order em this way without na doubt unless they're $500 or something...I know what I want!!!
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

cheech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1360
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2018, 09:31:05 AM »
hammer and ebonite has already done this. all the bowlersmart releases, vibe XRs, cyclone GB etc. i believe the requirement was for a complete batch of 500 or so which was $5000 or something along those lines.

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2018, 09:36:06 AM »
This would be awesome.

However, reality sucks:

1. Price per ball would be insane.
2. How would USBC approval work?  Let's all just agree that it wouldn't...

AlonzoHarris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2018, 09:58:23 AM »
Excellent marketing idea. No clue how many hundred dollars it would cost for profits to be correct for Utah.

As far logo it should have to be the logo for the core. 

It's the inverted fe2 then it gets a hyroad. And becomes r2X solid hyroad or NRG Pearl hyroad. That way there are zero problems with logos or names.

Lock core would be a lock logo etc.

Picking colors or logo colors would be plenty.

I would order em this way without na doubt unless they're $500 or something...I know what I want!!!

Agreed - logo matches choices.

This would be awesome.

However, reality sucks:

1. Price per ball would be insane.
2. How would USBC approval work?  Let's all just agree that it wouldn't...

I feel like USBC approval should't be an issue. If the core and cover are approved - the combinations of them shouldn't alter that approval. Color choices shouldn't matter either.
Current Rotation:
PhysiX
Code X
Code Black
Axiom Pearl
Phaze III
Trend
IQ Tour

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2018, 10:11:46 AM »
First off, bowlers as a whole are too cheap for this to work.  Second, there is no way for it to work around the current USBC approval process. 

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2018, 10:25:44 AM »
I feel like USBC approval should't be an issue. If the core and cover are approved - the combinations of them shouldn't alter that approval. Color choices shouldn't matter either.

Covers and cores by themselves are not approved by themselves - it is the ball as a whole that is tested and subject to the approval process.  You are not considering the fact that the USBC would have to completely overhaul their testing and approval process.  No small task....

AlonzoHarris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2018, 10:48:16 AM »
I feel like USBC approval should't be an issue. If the core and cover are approved - the combinations of them shouldn't alter that approval. Color choices shouldn't matter either.

Covers and cores by themselves are not approved by themselves - it is the ball as a whole that is tested and subject to the approval process.  You are not considering the fact that the USBC would have to completely overhaul their testing and approval process.  No small task....

I may need a more in depth understanding of what the USBC considers during it's testing and how it goes about it. I also wonder if the cores and covers are not approved by themselves because they honestly just haven't implemented a way of testing them individually.

Please note this concept is in good fun. Not looking to implement this or even have the means to bring this concept to life.
Current Rotation:
PhysiX
Code X
Code Black
Axiom Pearl
Phaze III
Trend
IQ Tour

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2018, 11:19:49 AM »
I feel like USBC approval should't be an issue. If the core and cover are approved - the combinations of them shouldn't alter that approval. Color choices shouldn't matter either.

Covers and cores by themselves are not approved by themselves - it is the ball as a whole that is tested and subject to the approval process.  You are not considering the fact that the USBC would have to completely overhaul their testing and approval process.  No small task....

I may need a more in depth understanding of what the USBC considers during it's testing and how it goes about it. I also wonder if the cores and covers are not approved by themselves because they honestly just haven't implemented a way of testing them individually.

Please note this concept is in good fun. Not looking to implement this or even have the means to bring this concept to life.

I know, I'm just being a total killjoy.  I think the idea has merit but given the money and politics of the bowling industry, it just can't happen as it's currently constructed.   

However, I'll play along.  I would like to see as many covers as possible wrapped around the Roto Nucleus core and the Storm NOS core.  Because, why not?

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 983
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2018, 11:38:01 AM »
Great idea but there's minimum order/runs for a reason.

 Set up process and everything else needed to make a run of balls along with the small percentage of seconds make this very costly.  Not to mention stopping production of other products to make a bunch or a few randoms would be a nightmare.

Cool idea but very likely more trouble then it's worth.  Brunswick at one time had this information posted.  It was a minimum run of 800 and a minimum of 80 I believe for any ball weight chosen.
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

AlonzoHarris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2018, 12:33:15 PM »
http://usbcongress.http.internapcdn.net/usbcongress/bowl/equipandspecs/pdfs/ESManual.pdf

Starts on page 11.

Honestly nothing unexpected listed. Can't say I was really taken back by any of the tests.

What would be kinda lame is if you design a ball and it's submitted, then rejected, it has to have a name and/or significant color change for re-submission. 
Current Rotation:
PhysiX
Code X
Code Black
Axiom Pearl
Phaze III
Trend
IQ Tour

AlonzoHarris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2018, 12:42:59 PM »
Great idea but there's minimum order/runs for a reason.

 Set up process and everything else needed to make a run of balls along with the small percentage of seconds make this very costly.  Not to mention stopping production of other products to make a bunch or a few randoms would be a nightmare.

Cool idea but very likely more trouble then it's worth.  Brunswick at one time had this information posted.  It was a minimum run of 800 and a minimum of 80 I believe for any ball weight chosen.

Totally get it. Production nightmare.

Would require new machinery that has the ability to adapt quickly to new input. Something that in a sense works like the touch screen soda machines Coke or whomever put out. More advance to where orders are uploaded into the machine from a management system. The machine then would pull from the pre-loaded materials - changing for each order. You could even set it to queue up orders for a set amount of hours, organize them by similar core or coverstock and then send them through the process. Just rambling at this point but if the industry had the money of the NFL this could be done haha.


I feel like USBC approval should't be an issue. If the core and cover are approved - the combinations of them shouldn't alter that approval. Color choices shouldn't matter either.

Covers and cores by themselves are not approved by themselves - it is the ball as a whole that is tested and subject to the approval process.  You are not considering the fact that the USBC would have to completely overhaul their testing and approval process.  No small task....

I may need a more in depth understanding of what the USBC considers during it's testing and how it goes about it. I also wonder if the cores and covers are not approved by themselves because they honestly just haven't implemented a way of testing them individually.

Please note this concept is in good fun. Not looking to implement this or even have the means to bring this concept to life.

I know, I'm just being a total killjoy.  I think the idea has merit but given the money and politics of the bowling industry, it just can't happen as it's currently constructed.   

However, I'll play along.  I would like to see as many covers as possible wrapped around the Roto Nucleus core and the Storm NOS core.  Because, why not?

Haha all good! Sometimes fun to play devils advocate.

I would definitely throw an order in for a Nucleus core and NOS core option.
Current Rotation:
PhysiX
Code X
Code Black
Axiom Pearl
Phaze III
Trend
IQ Tour

n00dlejester

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
  • The Dude Abides
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2018, 12:49:14 PM »
I'll take the R2X Pearl on the Defiant core, please and thank you.
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: Bowling Ball Concept
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2018, 06:08:42 PM »
I'll take the R2X Pearl on the Defiant core, please and thank you.

I'll take R2X hybrid polished and solid on anything!
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???