After reading Mike300's rant, I thought I had written it. I had the EXACT same scenario with Classic while in Houston. The last 3-4 years I was there, I went away from Classic, more toward Gran Prix, for all the same reasons and conversations.
Glad somebody else is catching that the etailers are not the biggest problem, the distributors are. I would have to research my recent diatribe about this in the Brunswick and Misc forums.
Smash makes a good point. Wouldn't be a good program for him, he has a monopoly on his market, why should he give back $5? He has a captive audience, they aren't going anywhere else.
If I was in Houston, I would have to have a guarantee that you are referring people ONLY to me, and for about a 50 mile radius. If you are going to refer to any shop that signs up, then big deal, I'm already getting my percentage of those people, don't want to give back $5. Shoot, I think I would go UP $5 minimum on blank fee, and that would be for all, not just bowling.com referrals.
Kidjete, lighten up on Mike300. Yes, he may have sounded harsh, that is his perogative, let SCOTT-bowling.com decide if he is harsh. Mike300 and MANY other honest hard working pro shop operators have had their living slowly eroded away over the years, and by many consumers, shops are seen as the bad guys. Until you can walk a mile in his shoes...... Hell, I think he took my shoes, or I took his??
Laufeye, you are funny!
It's really too late. If the etailers WANTED to help, they would have kept their prices above what pro shops can buy for and let them compete. The distributors should sell to shops at the same price as the nets, or at least give us the chance to.
--------------------
THIS SPACE FOR RENT