win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Core Shapes?  (Read 9917 times)

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Core Shapes?
« on: August 17, 2017, 05:15:37 PM »
Do core shapes matter? Do you think they make a difference? Not so much the number's but the shape of the core?
It seems to me or at least I got it in my head that they do despite the rg and diff numbers.
What say you?
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

 

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #31 on: August 19, 2017, 11:23:46 AM »
Bowling ball have NOT become complex...the confusion created by marketing & advertising by the manufactures is the biggest culprit...
Bowling ball technology has not advanced since 1997...particle/pro-active covers...

It still very simple-surface dictates length, pin to pap dictate flare potential & bowler is the ultimate decider
Equipment is a tool or enhancer of the bowlers attributes
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #32 on: August 19, 2017, 04:40:28 PM »
Quote from: JustRico on August 19, 2017, 11:23:46 AM
Bowling ball have NOT become complex...the confusion created by marketing & advertising by the manufactures is the biggest culprit...
Bowling ball technology has not advanced since 1997...particle/pro-active covers...

It still very simple-surface dictates length, pin to pap dictate flare potential & bowler is the ultimate decider
Equipment is a tool or enhancer of the bowlers attributes

So do core shapes matter despite the RG and Diif numbers?
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #33 on: August 19, 2017, 04:48:10 PM »
Diff is secondary RG is third...after surface
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

lilpossum1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #34 on: August 19, 2017, 05:55:49 PM »
OK I have to be the guy that brings in the hyroad and timeless. Same cover stock, same finish, very close to the same core numbers. Drastically different reactions. The difference is the hyroad core vs dual drive core. How does the dual drive core create such a large back end reaction than the hyroad core?
Logged

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #35 on: August 19, 2017, 06:11:43 PM »
Drastically different? How so?
Unless bowling balls are thrown the same amount of times under the same conditions, on a CATs to eliminate visual perception...I do not believe a statement such as drastically different can be made
Now against a SureLock due to cover maybe but...
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

HackJandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1321
  • On to greener pastures
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #36 on: August 19, 2017, 06:12:42 PM »
Quote from: lilpossum1 on August 19, 2017, 05:55:49 PM
OK I have to be the guy that brings in the hyroad and timeless. Same cover stock, same finish, very close to the same core numbers. Drastically different reactions. The difference is the hyroad core vs dual drive core. How does the dual drive core create such a large back end reaction than the hyroad core?

Sure do hear a lot more good things about the Hy-Road compared to the Timeless.  Core cover stock synergy is very important and your example proves it but probably not in the way you meant.  Seems like it is easier for a core to somewhat screw up a good cover stock than accent its strengths.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2017, 06:28:29 PM by HackJandy »
Logged
Kind of noob when made this account so take advice with grain of salt.

CoorZero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #37 on: August 19, 2017, 07:51:29 PM »
Quote from: JustRico on August 19, 2017, 04:48:10 PM
Diff is secondary RG is third...after surface

Kind of off the topic, but can RG be looked at in tiers? For example the "early" category of 2.46-2.5, the "mid" category of 2.51-2.55, and the "late" category of 2.56+? To boil it down a bit is there really that much difference between 2.46 and 2.49?

I'm sure this could be done with differential too, but from my experience I think the differences in differential ranges are more obvious than the differences in RG ranges. Which is part of why differential would be ahead of RG I assume.
Logged

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #38 on: August 19, 2017, 07:59:45 PM »
Shell is way more important, but I have noticed thatvcirevdhell matchups are very noticeable.  Best example for me is Marvel series.  I hated the original Marvel, but like many people the marvel pearl was a great piece for me
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #39 on: August 19, 2017, 08:00:24 PM »
Quote from: lilpossum1 on August 19, 2017, 05:55:49 PM
OK I have to be the guy that brings in the hyroad and timeless. Same cover stock, same finish, very close to the same core numbers. Drastically different reactions. The difference is the hyroad core vs dual drive core. How does the dual drive core create such a large back end reaction than the hyroad core?

Because due to the shape of the core, you're creating much different numbers after drilling. The numbers after drilling is what matters. I am willing to bet anything that after drilling (with the same layout) the Timeless will create more overall diff and a higher intermediate diff (after drilling). This is why you see such a stronger response downlane from the Timeless.
Logged

lilpossum1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #40 on: August 19, 2017, 08:53:31 PM »
Ahh thank you for the responses! Drastically different may have been a bit much, but your explanations made a lot of sense
Logged

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #41 on: August 19, 2017, 09:03:01 PM »
light bulbs for me too, weird thing to note.

storms high end shapes havent worked for me really since the virtual days.....

the codes seem to tho. 

crux nope
havent tried the lock
vivid lucid werent that good

im sure im forgetting a few
Logged
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #42 on: August 19, 2017, 09:07:56 PM »
Diff dictates flare potential which creates traction thus more important than RG
The Timeless is comparable to the Brunswick Quantum theory of multi densities covers...you have a core that is wrapped by a lighter materials surrounding it and then a cover material...core numbers stay more intact from weight to weight
Drilling numbers always change but too many believe it creates some magical reaction...
Add 80 grit and any ball will react
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #43 on: August 19, 2017, 11:07:52 PM »
Funny, just shows the difference in styles.  I didn't like the Vivid either, but Lucid was s great long oil tournament ball for me.  Not unlike the AZO Area that had the same core. 
Logged

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #44 on: August 20, 2017, 12:17:35 PM »
I started this topic because I've been trying to find something high rg that wasn't made for dry and wasn't flippy. I like low rg stuff because it's easier to control for me it seems but I have problems getting them down lane once the shot breaks in on one of the houses I bowl at. I'm going on my third season at this place and have two balls I like a lot here, a Bad Intentions and a Roto Grip Venus. The BI is my heavy oilier and shot shaper and the Venus is for the dry.
Anyways over the years I've learned that I favor the big round cores more but they always seem to come low rg,not the Venus and I absolutely love that ball. High rg,round fat core... But yes I agree it's not the be all end all as other stuff works well on different patterns and lanes. Thanks to all that chimed in to share their knowledge as it's much appreciated.   
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Core Shapes?
« Reply #45 on: August 20, 2017, 12:34:47 PM »
Surface will always dictate length but you need to look at slower response covers...something like a Rhino or Turbo/R or Nitrous...even if your rev rate is high enough and the friction strong enough...you can used sanded polyester with a strong weight hole to close down your angles
It's all abt response to friction and angles matching up
Logged
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
« previous next »