win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Could someone explain coverstock?  (Read 7379 times)

Zach M

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Could someone explain coverstock?
« on: July 13, 2007, 05:26:39 AM »
I have been bowling for quite awhile, but do not understand different coverstocks and surface adjustments.  What is pearl, pearl reactive, reactive, etc.?  Also, obviously a dull ball hooks earlier, but does it provide overall more hook?  Things like that I am curious about.  I know it may take awhile to explain, but any information is greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

Zach

 

BallsDeep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 870
Re: Could someone explain coverstock?
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2007, 02:07:56 PM »
There are urethane, reactive, and particle bowling balls.  

Generally Urethane is not used anymore, as it has a rather mild reaction on current lane surfaces and conditions.  There are limited offerings, that usually are in the low priced category.

Reactive bowling balls are known for their generally tacky surface and skid snap like motion.  Reactive bowling balls come in solid and pearl variations (and hybrids in some cases, i.e. less pearl additive).  Pearl balls have a more skid snap motion than solids and get through the front end of the lane easier than solids.  These can be found in lower priced as well as high priced offerings.

Particle bowling balls generally use reactive bases and a particle additive to increase traction in oil.  Generally this makes these balls less skid snap reacting.  They also come in solid and pearl variations.  There is also the issue of particle load, how much particle is added to the reactive base.  Higher loads have more traction in oil and respond in a more mild manner to the dry.  

Two further points.  Solid/Pearl classification has nothing to do with surface grit.  Generally pearls are polished, but this is not absolute.

A dull ball will provide more hook in oil so it is said to hook more, but whether or not it covers more boards is lane condition dependent.  Often times a pearl may be able to cover more boards as there is no burn up, or premature hook that reduces overall hook and hit.

If you have any more questions or a need for clarification, feel free to pm me.
--------------------
four fried chickens and a coke[/size=4]

Let me say something, let me say something...
AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: Could someone explain coverstock?
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2007, 02:53:52 PM »
Modern balls start with a urethane base and additives are put in it to get different effects.  Pretty much every ball has some sort of reactive additive, there are very few real urethanes left.

There are five basic types of coverstock used today: plastic, solid reactive, pearl reactive, solid particle, and pearl particle.  Plastic has no additives (not even a urethane base), very low friction, mostly for spares.

The "normal" reactive ball with the fewest additives is the solid reactive.  Medium length, will skid some in oil and react to dry boards in the backend.

To the solid reactive you can add finely ground mica to make pearl reactives.  The mica stiffens the coverstock so that there's less flexing where the ball contacts the lane.  Less flexing means less friction, which is why pearls tend to go longer than solids.  They won't react quite as much to drier boards because of that reduced friction.  That's one reason you see people using pearl balls when the heads and midlane are broken down, when the oil has been dried out or removed by earlier play.

You could add particles to a solid reactive base to make a solid particle coverstock.  The particles can be all sorts of things from rubber to ceramic to glass beads to (I think) diamond (someone once said that Legends used industrial diamond).  The canonical analogy is snow tires vs. racing slicks.  The particles protrude from the surface (microscopically) to give added traction in oil just like the treads on snow tires punch through the snow to the pavement below.  Because particle balls can find more friction earlier, they don't react quite as suddenly to the dry boards in the backend.

You control how much particle is added to the reactive base.  Higher loads means more studs meaning more friction.  Lower loads mean less friction (above the reactive base's friction).  High load particle balls might require a LOT of oil to reduce the friction they see, otherwise they'll hook too soon and use up all their energy.  Low load particles are more like all-season tires.  Some studs to prevent slipping, but smooth enough to not need a large amount of oil.

You could also add both the particle and the pearl to get a particle pearl.  Reaction-wise, they are usually very similar to solid reactives.  The effects of the particles and pearlization sort of cancel one another out: the pearlization helps reduce the friction that the particles generate, the particles help find friction that the pearlization reduces.

Sounds stupid, right?  It is.

Just kidding.  Like every other coverstock type, particle pearls have their place.  They can be smoother than solid reactives and not skid as much as pearls when there's carrydown (some of the oil in the front part of the lane has moved to the back, reducing the available friction in the backends).

Polish on a bowling ball makes changes in friction much more dramatic.  When there's oil, even a little bit, it helps the ball skid.  When there's dry, it helps the ball react.

Sanding a ball does the opposite, it blends the changes in friction by increasing friction when there's oil and reducing friction when there's dry (it doesn't really reduce friction there, but the ball doesn't usually have as much energy by the time it gets there so there's less reaction).

All these types of balls hook.  None necessarily hooks more than another, it's very dependent on the amount of oil on the lane and the condition of the ball surface.  A very dull pearl will find friction in the heaviest of oils, and if you can polish up a high load particle ball enough, it'll skid in even the lightest of oils.  But they all have their "native" lane conditions and their natural characteristics can be enhanced by the appropriate surface.

That's why you see most pearls coming polished from the factory (sometimes a high gloss, sometimes a compound finish like Brunswick's Rough Buff).  The polish adds to the pearlization to reduce friction in oil and increase reaction on the dry.  

Likewise for particle balls.  Not a lot of factory-polished solid particles because you usually want them to help you find friction and the polish does the opposite.  You want duller surfaces because that helps create early friction, just like the particles want to do.

Solid reactives and particle pearls, being more like the all-season tires, come in a wide variety of stock finishes.

SH

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Could someone explain coverstock?
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2007, 04:20:28 PM »
zach m, the explanations you just received on modern bowling balls is very informative. yet, there was a time when bowling ball coverstocks were wood or even stone. many ancient cultures played bowling-type games with balls made from stone. later, wood was the choice as it could be perfectly made into a round sphere by a lathe. as late as 1905 bowling balls made of lignum vitae were state of the art. around this time the hard rubber ball came along and it rolled much better on the wooden lanes they used. the plastic ball came along in 1960 and the rest is history......