win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?  (Read 4640 times)

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Hi All,

Would like to get your opinions on this topic, Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?

When considering that next new purchase, which is a more important factor?

Say you have ball A, which is an excellent ball, but for only 75-100 games...then you have ball B which is an average performing bowling ball, but lasts you 300-500+ games...which one do you go with, and be honest...

also please add if you bowl strictly leagues, or if you bowl tournaments regularly in addition to league, as that could have an effect on your decision

Thanks!


--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

 

JMORRIS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2008, 01:14:29 PM »
Why not have both?  Buy STORM!

Seriously, for me, I buy based on performance.  I buy enough balls that lifespan is never a factor.  

I mainly bowl leagues and a couple tournaments per year.

Jermey

John D Davis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2008, 01:23:15 PM »
I would go with ball A, simply because I am a tournament player. That being said, I want the best feeling ball in my hand at all times,physically and mentally... If I can use a ball for 10 games and win 2K with it, then duh, its a no brainer!!! Sometimes you need that greatness in a ball to give you a look better than what all the other bowlers have. I simply dont want to go bowl average in a tournament, I want to bowl2win!!!

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2008, 01:38:12 PM »
All balls hit and carry for someone on some condition with some surface prep.  If the ball isn't reacting the way you like or carrying the way you like, fix it.  Adjust the surface, plug and redrill it.

If you've done those things and it still isn't what you want, chuck it.

That said, if I can't get 300+ games on a ball, I don't want it.  I mostly bowl league but I bowl a few tournaments each year.  I cannot afford to replace a ball after only a few weeks or months, not to mention the dirty looks I get from the missus even when I do get a new ball.  75-100 games on the ball and it's kaput?  I'll never buy another ball with that cover again.  There's a good chance I simply won't buy that company's products again.

How often do we hear "it's the Indian, not the arrow"?  If the ball isn't working on that condition today, try it on another condition tomorrow.  The ball will work somewhere.

SH

Edited on 4/28/2008 1:38 PM

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2008, 01:38:54 PM »
Lifespan with out question which is one reason why I am NOT throwing Storm or Ebonite.
--------------------
Mainzerpower
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

Strapper_Squared

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2008, 01:45:59 PM »
Performance for me.  I usually don't keep equipment past 30-40 games (and that's only if I really like it), so lifespan isn't a big issue.  Plus, I feel that lifespan is (at least with some equipment) directly related to maintenance, so most balls are good for 100+ games anyways.

S^2
--------------------
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Absurd Quote Power Rankings
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

302efi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2008, 02:11:49 PM »
Britton please define:

~ Eexcellent performing

~ Average performing




--------------------
quote:
I will head to my local pro shop. Right after I buy it online.


Sport Bowling is a F**king joke

SKC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2008, 02:14:18 PM »

Nice topic.. Just had a conversation with a couple of friends about this very issue..

Personally i'm for Performance.. But being able to drill up a new ball at a low cost, definetely is a factor for me now.. But i used to consider Lifespan before that.. Now i can afford to drill up multiples, but i rarely do..

I used to practice a couple of hours everyday, and bowl leagues or tournaments 3 weekends out of a month.. So my new equipment would quickly get a lot of games..
Now i practice 1-2 times a week, bowl leagues, and at most 10 tournaments for the whole year, this includes nationals and regionals..

When i was competing a lot, Lifespan was definetely important for me, because i'd spend a lot of my money on travelling to other countries and Tournament-fees, i wouldn't make a lot of replacements in my arsenal.. I did a lot of surface changes instead..

I can see why some bowlers, who maybe buys that one ball every 2 years, but bowls 2-3 times every week, can be bummed out if there ball dies out after 50-100 games.. Especially if they're kids..
I once waited a long time for a ball that was on backorder, was supposed to be the biggest thing since pizza, threw it for 40-50 GOOD games, of which 1/3 might have been practice, to after those games end up with a ball that performed no better than a spareball.. I never drilled up a new one..
A friend of mine, who can afford it, drilled up a 2nd of a ball within 5 weeks because the first one died out after 50 games.. And he has actually already ordered a 3rd for stock.. Not everyone can do this..

I've been lucky/unlucky to have a couple of balls perform well over a number of years.. Lucky because i have found nothing like them, Unlucky because i've been so pleased with them that they've been discontinued, before i remembered to stock some..


--------------------


Tough times don't last, tough people do...

Aggression is an attitude, not an emotion...


VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2008, 02:22:57 PM »
quote:
Britton please define:

~ Eexcellent performing

~ Average performing


Think of excellent as that WOW ball that gives you that little bit of extra room and backend...or something to that effect...think of some of the best sellers out there now

Think of the avg ball as a solid performer but not one of those wow balls, nothing special just gets the job done...

Its kind of tough to describe what im asking for, and i dont want to name ball names cause everyones opinions are different...i like the responses im getting so far tho...keep them coming guys!
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

Edited on 4/28/2008 2:23 PM

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2008, 02:25:01 PM »
I used to bowl mostly just leagues, but now I'm bowling in more tournaments.  Usually I will win enough money off jackpots to pay for any bowling ball I buy within just a few games of using it.  So just from that regard, I'm not as worried about getting 300+ games out of a ball.  I also am not too worried about how a ball reacts out of the box.  I usually prefer the way a ball reacts after it's had a few games on it and gotten tracked up.

So, basically while I don't want ball death after just 50 games, I also don't need extreme longevity for hundreds upon hundreds of games.  Performance matters more than longevity to me.

(But for what it's worth, my Storm Special Agent has probably got 150 or so games on it, and it got me a 776 and a 790 series last month.  It's had only one hot water bath, and I clean it at least once a week with Clean & Dull.  It's maybe a couple or three boards weaker than it was brand new, but it still can kick pins around, gives me a little miss room, and can handle plenty of oil.  I have even used it successfully on a double-oiled condition in a house that already puts down quite a bit of oil -- 278 with a ringing 10 pin and a stone 8 pin on the fill ball.)

  • Guest
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2008, 02:32:46 PM »
Both are important. Brunswick satisfies both for me...


--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Amateur Staff

Slopsurprise

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2100
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2008, 02:52:32 PM »
quote:
Why not have both?  Buy STORM!




WORD!!!!!!!!

302efi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2008, 03:40:51 PM »
quote:
quote:
Britton please define:

~ Eexcellent performing

~ Average performing


Think of excellent as that WOW ball that gives you that little bit of extra room and backend...or something to that effect...think of some of the best sellers out there now

Think of the avg ball as a solid performer but not one of those wow balls, nothing special just gets the job done...

Its kind of tough to describe what im asking for, and i dont want to name ball names cause everyones opinions are different...i like the responses im getting so far tho...keep them coming guys!
--------------------



Ok so your saying would I rather have the wow factor _ _ _nite made gear that has 10 or 20 sets in it or the something for Storm's or Brunswick's midline that will get the job done, just not so flashy ?

I'd take a longer lasting ball over any of  _ _ _nites ball poster child balls !
--------------------
quote:
I will head to my local pro shop. Right after I buy it online.


Sport Bowling is a F**king joke

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2008, 03:51:18 PM »
Personally i believe all the smaller companies make products that last alot longer, visionary,legends come to mind.

sammy the sage

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 432
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2008, 08:49:17 PM »
Well..if you'rer not gonna NAME names...it mean's you've GOTTEN INTO BED w/some ball company's...so as to GET BALLS cheap...INSTEAD of doing HONEST ACCURATE review's...much like the bowling magazine's!

oh well..........................................................................................................................................................