win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: curious on a comparison  (Read 1814 times)

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5452
curious on a comparison
« on: May 05, 2017, 11:58:48 AM »
I know it's probably a long shot but has anyone been able to compare the Fanatic BTU to the Burgundy Hammer?

Just curious on if they're similar or if something sets them apart

 

Gene J Kanak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3005
Re: curious on a comparison
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2017, 02:46:29 PM »
I own a BTU and have seen the Burgundy in action. From what I can tell, the Burgundy is quite a bit stronger in oil. The burgundy actually picks up a bit in oil, but the movement it makes thereafter is smooth and rolly. For me, the BTU skates like a hockey puck in oil, but it still comes off the dry quite hard. For someone with a ton of hand, I could actually see these two serving as a 1-2 punch on mediums. You could use the burgundy early, and if you want to get the ball through the heads cleaner and avoid big angles, you can ball down to the BTU. Again, this is my impression from owning the BTU and having watched a few Burgundy Hammers.

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5452
Re: curious on a comparison
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2017, 02:49:27 PM »
That's pretty close to what I feel I've seen. Thanks for the input

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: curious on a comparison
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2017, 03:09:02 PM »
I own a BTU and have seen the Burgundy in action. From what I can tell, the Burgundy is quite a bit stronger in oil. The burgundy actually picks up a bit in oil, but the movement it makes thereafter is smooth and rolly. For me, the BTU skates like a hockey puck in oil, but it still comes off the dry quite hard. For someone with a ton of hand, I could actually see these two serving as a 1-2 punch on mediums. You could use the burgundy early, and if you want to get the ball through the heads cleaner and avoid big angles, you can ball down to the BTU. Again, this is my impression from owning the BTU and having watched a few Burgundy Hammers.

Gene,

I've seen you say this several times now. Are you just using the BTU on more oil than that for which it was designed?

I mean, I can see the Burgundy, at its super-dull 500 grit surface, hooking on medium to medium-heavy oil. But the BTU, even at its 1500 grit, is designed, as far a I know, for medium-light oil. If you use it on medium oil, it is going to skate; that is expected. It's what I've seen too. On medium light oil, it has a nice relatively even reaction, even at 2000 or 2500 grit, from what I have seen with mine. Heck, on medium-light oil, it hooks a good amount.

Yes, I can see these 2 balls being 1-2 punch at their stock surfaces, as you said.  I haven't tried it yet, but if you take the BTU down to the same 500 grit as the stock Burgundy, it should skate a lot less.

Maybe you expected the BTU to handle heavier oil at its relatively rough stock surface of 500/1500? I did also, and was shocked at its such easy length, almost a requirement for my slower than average ball speed. As opposed you you, I was delighted with its easy length.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2778
Re: curious on a comparison
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2017, 11:27:44 PM »
I had the burgundy.  Didn't care for it in box.  The shell is different than anything else out there.  Very condition specific for me.  On some shots it read carry down like a urethane ball.  On others it over undered like a resin ball.  A friend if mine has one that has been very good for him on flatter patterns but he keeps it about 2000 surface.  I haven't thrown the BTU but doubt it would act like the burgundy in many conditions.