win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: City Tournament Prize Money  (Read 1634 times)

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4583
  • Former proshop worker
City Tournament Prize Money
« on: May 25, 2014, 04:58:13 PM »
Our local association recently ran it's association tournaments. Participation has been down sharply in recent years.

Competition was held in an Open Division, Women's Division, Open Senior Division, and Senior Women's Division.

During the winter months they had ball raffles at all the centers with the proceeds to go towards prize money at the tournaments.

The association kicked in an extra $2000 towards the tournaments prize funds and the ball raffles created another $7800 I believe so together they added about 10K to the prize fund.

How should this money be distributed?

Should each division get 1/4 of the money? Or distributed to each division by a percentage of total entries?

Should it be used to simply increase prize payouts to the winners?

Should it be used to increase the number of places being paid?

Or some combination of both? Or something else I haven't thought of?

 

Mighty Fish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
Re: City Tournament Prize Money
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2014, 05:18:49 PM »
Dear Pinbuster:

Because the association raised the additional funds, the association tournament directors -- perhaps with guidance from the board of directors -- should be entrusted with proper distribution of the monies into the prize funds.

Some of your "options" could be handled without any problems. However, your suggestion of additional "number of places being paid" is probably out of order (because your tournaments almost certainly have prize payout ratios incorporated into the rules). Of course, those ratios could be changed, but it would have to be done prior to printing of the official entry blanks.

You refer to four divisions -- Open, Women's, Open Senior and Women's Senior -- and some might object to a one-fourth distribution into each of the categories because female members would have the right to compete in all four tournaments while the male members could enter only two of them. But such a distribution wouldn't necessarily be improper, and the funds could be distributed in that manner.

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4583
  • Former proshop worker
Re: City Tournament Prize Money
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2014, 06:12:23 AM »
They stuck with the announced cashing ratio 1:5. And I agree that once that was announced they had to stick with it.

But the additional money was raised before entry forms and rules were published so the prize ratio could have been adjusted.

I haven't seen a prize list yet I talked to a board member who said they were going to spread the money proportionally among the division by number of entries.

My feelings since they were trying to gain entries to the tournament by increasing the prize fund they would have been better served by adjusting down the prize ratio and paying more places and making more bowlers feel like they had a chance rather than giving larger payouts to only a few places. Money for each place could have been increased and more winners of money would have been had.

Entries were still low in the tournament. In some of the divisions only 2 teams got prize money. For the most part it was the same groups of bowlers who dominate the tournament every year.

I agree in that senior women have a shot at all the extra money and that as a senior male I would have only had a shot at about 1/2 the money. Adult males only about 1/4 of the money.

The tournament was held over 2 weekends. The first weekend we were at nationals and I didn't feel like bowling 2 divisions (18 games) in 2 days when we got back.

It is not sour grapes on my part. I ended up winning one event and cashing in 2 others so I will make out with the current system. But I can remember when the men's event had 300 to 400 teams this year here were 27 teams in the open division and about 30 total in the other 3 divisions.