win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: fantasy ball  (Read 3939 times)

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
fantasy ball
« on: March 16, 2013, 05:50:17 PM »
Just thought wouldn't a ball with a 2.57 rg .06 differential and a .07 intermediate differential and a pure reactive cover have a monster backend that most bowlers enjoy? (A.k.a. , sideways bowling ball)
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2013, 06:56:18 PM »
Just thought wouldn't a ball with a 2.57 rg .06 differential and a .07 intermediate differential and a pure reactive cover have a monster backend that most bowlers enjoy? (A.k.a. , sideways bowling ball)

A .07" intermediate differential? I don't believe such can exist.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2013, 07:01:52 PM »
Hate to burst your bubble... but if a company thought your "fantasy" specs were worth marketing it would already be on the market.

Bowling is about knocking over 10 pins, not covering boards...

Also, you might want to clarify on your numbers... no ball designer in place at any respected ball company would (or can) create  a ball with that much intermediate diff...

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2013, 07:31:45 PM »
None of those numbers stand out as unusual. Option 3 or 4 I like.

A .07 int diff is available and not out of the norm. Track 607 comes to mind and any of their other balls will be close like the 706 508 and ect.

There have been plenty of bowling balls with int diffs of .030. Siege, many Morich balls, Track 930 series, some from Hammer ect.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2013, 07:54:10 PM »
None of those numbers stand out as unusual. Option 3 or 4 I like.

A .07 int diff is available and not out of the norm. Track 607 comes to mind and any of their other balls will be close like the 706 508 and ect.

There have been plenty of bowling balls with int diffs of .030. Siege, many Morich balls, Track 930 series, some from Hammer ect.

Don't you mean that there are plenty of balls out there with .007 intermediate differential?

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2013, 08:00:28 PM »
Track 607 has an intermediate differential of 0.007, not 0.07.  0.07 would be rediculously large.  I've seen a few in the 0.03 - 0.035 range, but nothing higher off the top of my head.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2013, 08:16:57 PM »
Sorry using my phone. Yes .007, not .07, I was seeing not reading. He also list a diff of .06 with that ball which I assume is wrong as well.

 I was seeing  rg 2.57 diff .60 and int diff .007 but thats not what was listed.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2013, 08:27:39 PM »
Sorry using my phone. Yes .007, not .07, I was seeing not reading. He also list a diff of .06 with that ball which I assume is wrong as well.

 I was seeing  rg 2.57 diff .60 and int diff .007 but thats not what was listed.

A diff of 0.60 is also illegal... Remember, the decimal point is your friend.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2013, 08:40:00 PM »
.060
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8152
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2013, 10:53:09 PM »
I think that is a typo.  Not .07 but perhaps .027 like in the poll?
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

lifted rillo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2013, 11:39:28 AM »
So glad to see EVERYONE troll this guy's post.

But to answer the original question, surface dictates 70% of motion. The core dictates the shape. Smooth surface = flippier reaction shape. So, this core would give a nice, sharp breakpoint shape.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2013, 11:41:23 AM by lifted rillo »

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2013, 05:36:39 AM »
Correction, I meant .027. Sorry for the confusion.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2013, 05:38:43 AM by 2handedrook12 »
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: fantasy ball
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2013, 05:41:01 PM »
By the way, I am not interested in a ball that goes "sideways". I only posted this topic because I know bowlers like a ball that has a huge backend. Not a ball that hooks the most in oil. They just have a assume that a ball that is made to hook has the backend motion they are looking for. That's why equipment like the issue TOUR pearl, dirty look, violent eruption, vow, victory road, misfit pearl, ringer,etc. sale so well. I'm sure you know this already but I just wanted to post something interesting. I can see a company like storm,dv8, or hammer making a ball like this.
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl