win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: sarge easter vs convential  (Read 4382 times)

BriGreentea

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
sarge easter vs convential
« on: December 24, 2019, 09:56:54 AM »
Hello,
I recently went to a sarge easter grip with in old ball. Had the ring plugged and the middle left finger tip with a grip. It took me a couple weeks how to throw it without hurting my already painful ring finger but then figured out something that worked for me and I can't picture going back to regular finger tip but curious about standard conventional and I refuse to drop weight from 15 to 14 pounds. I also once had a driller convince me long ago on a brand new ball to go from no pitches on my thumb and have my fingers and thumb drilled reverse and it was terrible. I kept the 1/8 reverse but the fingers were plugged.

I just don't have the strength in my fingers like I used to do to decades of bowling and typing from my job. I actually wished I tried this 15 years ago. I'm thinking I could try a house ball and find a 14. I do think if I get a new ball the sarge grip will suffice with some moderate span and pitch adjustments. I guess I could picture hanging up on the ball with conventional and right now I can actually roll the ball over my mark without worries and distractions of pain.

 

timw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Re: sarge easter vs convential
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2019, 12:44:58 PM »
If I average 180 as an old guy, slower, rev challenged but still speed dominant, gradually dropping to this avg as I age,

PLEASE explain why I should not return to my conventional grip when I started at age 19.

Won’t I get more speed with a conventional grip? Is it no revs with conventional?

I have gone a season down to 14# and find that 14# does not carry as well on off hits as 15#.  So now I throw 15# again but my age is catching up, knee arthritis, two back surgeries and now a pinched nerve again.  No complaints here, I still love the comraderie of bowling and now bowl two mixed leagues with many friends and now my adult children nieces, cousins.  I love the game but also love the competition, still bowl state, state seniors and Nationals.  What about a conventional or dropped ring finger?

bcw1969

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
Re: sarge easter vs convential
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2019, 08:03:38 PM »
Some yeas ago I tried a sarge easter grip. Could not get used to having one finger one way and the other another, so that never stuck------however a couple of seasons back I went to a conventional grip(with inserts) because I was having a horrible time controlling the breakpoint. Switching did help in that dept but it also has helped me physically in my fingers. I have bone spurs and probably arthritis in my bowling fingers and two large knots on each bowling finger, and they used to swell a lot when I bowled more than just my league night on any given week, but since I went conventional I have not had any finger issues of that sort so conventional is staying around.

Brad

spmcgivern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2079
Re: sarge easter vs convential
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2019, 09:12:01 AM »
I tried a Sarge Easter grip for a couple years due to immense ring finger pain. Didn't take long for my revs to get almost back to where they were before.  The one area there was a change was my tilt increased slightly and I had a tendency to have bad throws with even higher tilt due to my finger position at release.  But eventually my finger healed and I went back to a normal fingertip.

Ultimately one should go with what feels best for them.  At some point in a career, it becomes more about enjoying the game and having significant finger pain is not enjoyable.  Find what allows you to bowl with the least amount of pain and you your game will adjust itself.